ICP vs UVM — price, size and safety, side by side

ICP (Base) vs UVM (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-08 / 2026-11-15.

UVMA

$0.3618

Universe Meta on Polygon

Trade UVM

ICP vs UVM — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-08T21:16:18

ICP −18.3% · UVM −4.30% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.

	ICP	UVM
Price	$2.42	$0.3618
Market cap	$1.37B	$766.92M
24h volume	$48.31M all venues	$9.07K DEX
Liquidity	$230.93K	$211.78K
FDV	$726.37K	$673.82M
Holders	6,579	2,858
Age (days)	335	601
Safety grade	B	A

Where they differ

ICP measures ~1.8× the market cap of UVM
ICP measures ~5,324× the 24h volume of UVM
ICP measures ~2.3× the holder count of UVM
over the shared window ICP moved −18.3% while UVM moved −4.30%

What the data says

ICP at 0x00f3c42833c3170159af4e92dbb451fb3f708917 is a wrapped claim on the Internet Computer token trading on Base, 320 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $1.4 billion market cap dwarfs the $726.4 thousand fully-diluted figure priced on 275.6 thousand local units — a thin slice of a billion-dollar asset.

The local book is thin against the headline but the tape is hot: $230.9 thousand of tracked depth on $1.1 million of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling itself multiple times a day through routed flow. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.

Full ICP safety read →

UVM

UVM — Universe Meta — is a 601-day-old Polygon token at 0x6966fec28ae7f598bd29c788def80f56ffa12de9, and it carries the batch's widest cap-to-book gap: a $766.9 million market cap against $211.8 thousand of tracked pool liquidity on the October 31, 2026 snapshot.

The page's own flag says it plainly: the pool is large in dollars but thin against the token's own cap — an exit has to be sized against the pool, not the headline. The tape is quiet besides: $7.0 thousand of daily volume says the cap sits still rather than trades. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.

Full UVM safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, ICP or UVM?

By tracked market cap: ICP (Base) measures $1.37B and UVM (Polygon) measures $766.92M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, ICP or UVM?

On the contract checks we publish: ICP (Base) grades B and UVM (Polygon) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have ICP and UVM performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-08T21:16:18, the measured snapshots show ICP at −18.3% and UVM at −4.30%.

More comparisons

ICP vs SOLVBTC ICP vs AAVE.E ICP vs RENDER ICP vs GRASS UVM vs AAVE.E SOLVBTC vs UVM UVM vs RENDER UVM vs GRASS

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-08T21:16:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.