ICP vs RENDER — price, size and safety, side by side

ICP (Base) vs RENDER (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-08 / 2026-11-15.

ICP vs RENDER — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-08T21:16:18

ICP −18.3% · RENDER −16.6% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.

	ICP	RENDER
Price	$2.42	$1.36
Market cap	$1.37B	$765.04M
24h volume	$48.31M all venues	$36.06M all venues
Liquidity	$230.93K	$196.37K
FDV	$726.37K	$765.04M
Holders	6,579	129,255
Age (days)	335	—
Safety grade	B	A

Where they differ

ICP measures ~1.8× the market cap of RENDER
RENDER measures ~20× the holder count of ICP

What the data says

ICP at 0x00f3c42833c3170159af4e92dbb451fb3f708917 is a wrapped claim on the Internet Computer token trading on Base, 320 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $1.4 billion market cap dwarfs the $726.4 thousand fully-diluted figure priced on 275.6 thousand local units — a thin slice of a billion-dollar asset.

The local book is thin against the headline but the tape is hot: $230.9 thousand of tracked depth on $1.1 million of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling itself multiple times a day through routed flow. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.

Full ICP safety read →

RENDER

RENDER is the token of Render Network, the distributed GPU-rendering marketplace — one of the largest projects with a Solana-native token since its 2023 migration from Ethereum, and by far the biggest name on this page's list that most readers will already know. The November 6, 2026 snapshot reads roughly $765 million of market capitalization with 129,255 holders on this chain, mint rndrizKT3MK1iimdxRdWabcF7Zg7AR5T4nud4EkHBof.

Honesty about what this snapshot resolved: the mint and freeze authority flags both came back unconfirmed — recorded as unknown, not assumed clean and not assumed live. A migrated, upgrade-managed token like RENDER runs its issuance through program machinery rather than a bare SPL switch, which is often why a simple flag read does not resolve. The scanner above performs the direct read in seconds; do that before relying on either flag, and see the authority guide for what each switch would mean.

Full RENDER safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, ICP or RENDER?

By tracked market cap: ICP (Base) measures $1.37B and RENDER (Solana) measures $765.04M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, ICP or RENDER?

On the contract checks we publish: ICP (Base) grades B and RENDER (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have ICP and RENDER performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-08T21:16:18, the measured snapshots show ICP at −18.3% and RENDER at −16.6%.

More comparisons

ICP vs SOLVBTC ICP vs UVM ICP vs AAVE.E ICP vs GRASS AAVE.E vs RENDER UVM vs RENDER RENDER vs GRASS RENDER vs ETHFI

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-08T21:16:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.