UVM vs RENDER — price, size and safety, side by side

UVM (Polygon) vs RENDER (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.

UVMA

$0.3618

Universe Meta on Polygon

Trade UVM

UVM vs RENDER — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30

UVM −8.44% · RENDER −26.8% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.

	UVM	RENDER
Price	$0.3618	$1.36
Market cap	$766.92M	$765.04M
24h volume	$9.07K DEX	$36.06M all venues
Liquidity	$211.78K	$196.37K
FDV	$673.82M	$765.04M
Holders	2,858	129,255
Age (days)	601	—
Safety grade	A	A

Where they differ

RENDER measures ~3,974× the 24h volume of UVM
RENDER measures ~45× the holder count of UVM
over the shared window UVM moved −8.44% while RENDER moved −26.8%

What the data says

UVM — Universe Meta — is a 601-day-old Polygon token at 0x6966fec28ae7f598bd29c788def80f56ffa12de9, and it carries the batch's widest cap-to-book gap: a $766.9 million market cap against $211.8 thousand of tracked pool liquidity on the October 31, 2026 snapshot.

The page's own flag says it plainly: the pool is large in dollars but thin against the token's own cap — an exit has to be sized against the pool, not the headline. The tape is quiet besides: $7.0 thousand of daily volume says the cap sits still rather than trades. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.

Full UVM safety read →

RENDER

RENDER is the token of Render Network, the distributed GPU-rendering marketplace — one of the largest projects with a Solana-native token since its 2023 migration from Ethereum, and by far the biggest name on this page's list that most readers will already know. The November 6, 2026 snapshot reads roughly $765 million of market capitalization with 129,255 holders on this chain, mint rndrizKT3MK1iimdxRdWabcF7Zg7AR5T4nud4EkHBof.

Honesty about what this snapshot resolved: the mint and freeze authority flags both came back unconfirmed — recorded as unknown, not assumed clean and not assumed live. A migrated, upgrade-managed token like RENDER runs its issuance through program machinery rather than a bare SPL switch, which is often why a simple flag read does not resolve. The scanner above performs the direct read in seconds; do that before relying on either flag, and see the authority guide for what each switch would mean.

Full RENDER safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, UVM or RENDER?

By tracked market cap: UVM (Polygon) measures $766.92M and RENDER (Solana) measures $765.04M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, UVM or RENDER?

On the contract checks we publish: UVM (Polygon) grades A and RENDER (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have UVM and RENDER performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show UVM at −8.44% and RENDER at −26.8%.

More comparisons

UVM vs AAVE.E SOLVBTC vs UVM ICP vs UVM UVM vs GRASS AAVE.E vs RENDER RENDER vs GRASS RENDER vs ETHFI RENDER vs ZRO

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.