HostSOLVBTC vs UVM — price, size and safety, side by side
SOLVBTC (Berachain) vs UVM (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.
SOLVBTC vs UVM — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30
| SOLVBTC | UVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $65.10K | $0.3618 |
| Market cap | $474.93M | $766.92M |
| 24h volume | $0.5223 DEX | $9.07K DEX |
| Liquidity | $225.86K | $211.78K |
| FDV | $24.58K | $673.82M |
| Holders | 5,787 | 2,858 |
| Age (days) | 610 | 601 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- UVM measures ~1.6× the market cap of SOLVBTC
- UVM measures ~17,374× the 24h volume of SOLVBTC
- SOLVBTC measures ~2.0× the holder count of UVM
- over the shared window SOLVBTC moved −21.0% while UVM moved −7.10%
What the data says
SOLVBTC
There's a small gap on this page — SOLVBTC's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Looking at the market data, SOLVBTC shows a $225.98K pool, 5,787 wallets holding and an established record at 610 days as of 2026-10-09. Set the $225.98K pool against roughly $526.73M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. A 5,787-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. Reassuringly, the wallet that created SOLVBTC holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
UVM
UVM — Universe Meta — is a 601-day-old Polygon token at 0x6966fec28ae7f598bd29c788def80f56ffa12de9, and it carries the batch's widest cap-to-book gap: a $766.9 million market cap against $211.8 thousand of tracked pool liquidity on the October 31, 2026 snapshot.
The page's own flag says it plainly: the pool is large in dollars but thin against the token's own cap — an exit has to be sized against the pool, not the headline. The tape is quiet besides: $7.0 thousand of daily volume says the cap sits still rather than trades. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SOLVBTC or UVM?
By tracked market cap: SOLVBTC (Berachain) measures $474.93M and UVM (Polygon) measures $766.92M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SOLVBTC or UVM?
On the contract checks we publish: SOLVBTC (Berachain) grades B and UVM (Polygon) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SOLVBTC and UVM performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show SOLVBTC at −21.0% and UVM at −7.10%.
More comparisons
ICP vs SOLVBTCSOLVBTC vs AAVE.ESOLVBTC vs RENDERSOLVBTC vs GRASSUVM vs AAVE.EUVM vs RENDERICP vs UVMUVM vs GRASS
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.