HostSOLVBTC vs RENDER — price, size and safety, side by side
SOLVBTC (Berachain) vs RENDER (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.
SOLVBTC vs RENDER — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30
| SOLVBTC | RENDER | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $65.10K | $1.36 |
| Market cap | $474.93M | $765.04M |
| 24h volume | $0.5223 DEX | $36.06M all venues |
| Liquidity | $225.86K | $196.37K |
| FDV | $24.58K | $765.04M |
| Holders | 5,787 | 129,255 |
| Age (days) | 610 | — |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- RENDER measures ~1.6× the market cap of SOLVBTC
- RENDER measures ~69,052,472× the 24h volume of SOLVBTC
- RENDER measures ~22× the holder count of SOLVBTC
- over the shared window SOLVBTC moved −21.0% while RENDER moved −27.3%
What the data says
SOLVBTC
There's a small gap on this page — SOLVBTC's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Looking at the market data, SOLVBTC shows a $225.98K pool, 5,787 wallets holding and an established record at 610 days as of 2026-10-09. Set the $225.98K pool against roughly $526.73M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. A 5,787-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. Reassuringly, the wallet that created SOLVBTC holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
RENDER
RENDER is the token of Render Network, the distributed GPU-rendering marketplace — one of the largest projects with a Solana-native token since its 2023 migration from Ethereum, and by far the biggest name on this page's list that most readers will already know. The November 6, 2026 snapshot reads roughly $765 million of market capitalization with 129,255 holders on this chain, mint rndrizKT3MK1iimdxRdWabcF7Zg7AR5T4nud4EkHBof.
Honesty about what this snapshot resolved: the mint and freeze authority flags both came back unconfirmed — recorded as unknown, not assumed clean and not assumed live. A migrated, upgrade-managed token like RENDER runs its issuance through program machinery rather than a bare SPL switch, which is often why a simple flag read does not resolve. The scanner above performs the direct read in seconds; do that before relying on either flag, and see the authority guide for what each switch would mean.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SOLVBTC or RENDER?
By tracked market cap: SOLVBTC (Berachain) measures $474.93M and RENDER (Solana) measures $765.04M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SOLVBTC or RENDER?
On the contract checks we publish: SOLVBTC (Berachain) grades B and RENDER (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SOLVBTC and RENDER performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show SOLVBTC at −21.0% and RENDER at −27.3%.
More comparisons
ICP vs SOLVBTCSOLVBTC vs UVMSOLVBTC vs AAVE.ESOLVBTC vs GRASSAAVE.E vs RENDERUVM vs RENDERRENDER vs GRASSRENDER vs ETHFI
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.