HostRENDER vs GRASS — price, size and safety, side by side
RENDER (Solana) vs GRASS (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-27 / 2026-10-27.
RENDER vs GRASS — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-27T12:16:05
| RENDER | GRASS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.66 | $0.6691 |
| Market cap | $933.19M | $509.46M |
| 24h volume | $599.42K DEX | $4.06M DEX |
| Liquidity | $331.88K | $292.72K |
| FDV | $933.19M | $509.46M |
| Holders | 125,921 | 380,863 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- RENDER measures ~1.8× the market cap of GRASS
- GRASS measures ~6.8× the 24h volume of RENDER
- GRASS measures ~3.0× the holder count of RENDER
- over the shared window RENDER moved +9.97% while GRASS moved +102%
What the data says
RENDER
RENDER is the token of Render Network, the distributed GPU-rendering marketplace — one of the largest projects with a Solana-native token since its 2023 migration from Ethereum, and by far the biggest name on this page's list that most readers will already know. The October 6, 2026 snapshot reads roughly $933 million of market capitalization with 125,921 holders on this chain, mint rndrizKT3MK1iimdxRdWabcF7Zg7AR5T4nud4EkHBof.
Honesty about what this snapshot resolved: the mint and freeze authority flags both came back unconfirmed — recorded as unknown, not assumed clean and not assumed live. A migrated, upgrade-managed token like RENDER runs its issuance through program machinery rather than a bare SPL switch, which is often why a simple flag read does not resolve. The scanner above performs the direct read in seconds; do that before relying on either flag, and see the authority guide for what each switch would mean.
GRASS
GRASS pays people for something they didn't know they could sell: idle internet bandwidth. Users run a browser extension or node, the network routes web-scraping traffic through their residential connections — primarily to gather training data for AI companies — and rewards flow back in tokens. It's one of the cleaner product stories in the DePIN category, and after an October 2024 airdrop to early node-runners, the token at mint Grass7B4RdKfBCjTKgSqnXkqjwiGvQyFbuSCUJr3XXjs reaches roughly $509.5 million of market capitalization across 380,863 holders in NexFlow's October 6, 2026 snapshot.
Structure: freeze authority revoked, so no one can lock holders out of selling; the creator-associated wallet share reads effectively zero; and the mint authority is not fully retired in this snapshot — consistent with a token whose supply still has scheduled distribution ahead of it (rewards, ecosystem, and investor allocations vesting on public timetables). That's the normal shape for a venture-backed network token, and it means future float growth is a calendar fact to price in rather than a surprise to fear.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RENDER or GRASS?
By tracked market cap: RENDER (Solana) measures $933.19M and GRASS (Solana) measures $509.46M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RENDER or GRASS?
On the contract checks we publish: RENDER (Solana) grades A and GRASS (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RENDER and GRASS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-27T12:16:05, the measured snapshots show RENDER at +9.97% and GRASS at +102%.
More comparisons
HLX vs RENDERRAIN vs RENDERRENDER vs ICPRENDER vs VIRTUALVIRTUAL vs GRASSICP vs GRASSGRASS vs AAVE.EHLX vs GRASS
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-27T12:16:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.