HostRENDER vs VIRTUAL — price, size and safety, side by side
RENDER (Solana) vs VIRTUAL (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-27 / 2026-10-27.
RENDER vs VIRTUAL — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-27T12:16:05
| RENDER | VIRTUAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.66 | $0.6114 |
| Market cap | $933.19M | $22.88M |
| 24h volume | $599.42K DEX | $399.67K DEX |
| Liquidity | $331.88K | $2.19M |
| FDV | $933.19M | $22.88M |
| Holders | 125,921 | 28,376 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- RENDER measures ~41× the market cap of VIRTUAL
- VIRTUAL measures ~6.6× the liquidity of RENDER
- RENDER measures ~4.4× the holder count of VIRTUAL
- over the shared window RENDER moved +9.97% while VIRTUAL moved −15.2%
What the data says
RENDER
RENDER is the token of Render Network, the distributed GPU-rendering marketplace — one of the largest projects with a Solana-native token since its 2023 migration from Ethereum, and by far the biggest name on this page's list that most readers will already know. The October 6, 2026 snapshot reads roughly $933 million of market capitalization with 125,921 holders on this chain, mint rndrizKT3MK1iimdxRdWabcF7Zg7AR5T4nud4EkHBof.
Honesty about what this snapshot resolved: the mint and freeze authority flags both came back unconfirmed — recorded as unknown, not assumed clean and not assumed live. A migrated, upgrade-managed token like RENDER runs its issuance through program machinery rather than a bare SPL switch, which is often why a simple flag read does not resolve. The scanner above performs the direct read in seconds; do that before relying on either flag, and see the authority guide for what each switch would mean.
VIRTUAL
VIRTUAL is Virtuals Protocol's token — the asset behind one of crypto-AI's more durable experiments: a platform where AI agents launch as tradable tokens and their activity routes value back to the protocol's token. The mint 3iQL8BFS2vE7mww4ehAqQHAsbmRNCrPxizWAT2Zfyr9y is the Solana deployment; our October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $2.2 million of tracked pool liquidity and grades it A.
The honest shape: Virtuals is a platform bet in the crypto-AI cohort — its token's value depends on agents it hosts actually generating sustained activity rather than launch-day volume spikes, which is the failure mode most agent-token platforms hit. The A grade covers the Solana mint; the platform's usage is an off-chain measurement.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RENDER or VIRTUAL?
By tracked market cap: RENDER (Solana) measures $933.19M and VIRTUAL (Solana) measures $22.88M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RENDER or VIRTUAL?
On the contract checks we publish: RENDER (Solana) grades A and VIRTUAL (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RENDER and VIRTUAL performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-27T12:16:05, the measured snapshots show RENDER at +9.97% and VIRTUAL at −15.2%.
More comparisons
HLX vs RENDERRAIN vs RENDERRENDER vs ICPCRV vs RENDERVIRTUAL vs MORPHOEURC vs VIRTUALVIRTUAL vs LITSHIB vs VIRTUAL
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-27T12:16:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.