HostCRV vs RENDER — price, size and safety, side by side
CRV (Ethereum) vs RENDER (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-27 / 2026-10-27.
CRV vs RENDER — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-10-27T12:16:05
| CRV | RENDER | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.3345 | $1.66 |
| Market cap | $559.04M | $933.19M |
| 24h volume | $948.47K DEX | $599.42K DEX |
| Liquidity | $9.96M | $331.88K |
| FDV | $861.85M | $933.19M |
| Holders | 101,017 | 125,921 |
| Age (days) | 1,105 | — |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- RENDER measures ~1.7× the market cap of CRV
- CRV measures ~30× the liquidity of RENDER
- CRV measures ~1.6× the 24h volume of RENDER
- over the shared window CRV moved −2.66% while RENDER moved −18.2%
What the data says
CRV
CRV — Curve DAO Token at 0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52 — is the governance and incentive token of Curve, the stable-swap AMM that carries a meaningful share of all stablecoin and LST volume on Ethereum. This is a six-year-old protocol token, not a launch, and the honest risks are the ones an established protocol token actually runs: governance economics, emissions, and founder concentration — not honeypot mechanics.
The October 9, 2026 snapshot reads a $559.0 million market cap against an $861.8 million fully-diluted value — roughly two-thirds of eventual supply circulating — with $10.0 million of tracked pool depth and 101,017 holders. Depth at that scale is a real exit book for a retail position.
RENDER
RENDER is the token of Render Network, the distributed GPU-rendering marketplace — one of the largest projects with a Solana-native token since its 2023 migration from Ethereum, and by far the biggest name on this page's list that most readers will already know. The October 6, 2026 snapshot reads roughly $933 million of market capitalization with 125,921 holders on this chain, mint rndrizKT3MK1iimdxRdWabcF7Zg7AR5T4nud4EkHBof.
Honesty about what this snapshot resolved: the mint and freeze authority flags both came back unconfirmed — recorded as unknown, not assumed clean and not assumed live. A migrated, upgrade-managed token like RENDER runs its issuance through program machinery rather than a bare SPL switch, which is often why a simple flag read does not resolve. The scanner above performs the direct read in seconds; do that before relying on either flag, and see the authority guide for what each switch would mean.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CRV or RENDER?
By tracked market cap: CRV (Ethereum) measures $559.04M and RENDER (Solana) measures $933.19M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CRV or RENDER?
On the contract checks we publish: CRV (Ethereum) grades B and RENDER (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CRV and RENDER performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-10-27T12:16:05, the measured snapshots show CRV at −2.66% and RENDER at −18.2%.
More comparisons
USDTB vs CRVCRV vs USDCCRV vs SUSDAIAAVE vs CRVHLX vs RENDERRAIN vs RENDERRENDER vs ICPRENDER vs VIRTUAL
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-10-27T12:16:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.