HostRENDER vs ICP — price, size and safety, side by side
RENDER (Solana) vs ICP (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-27 / 2026-10-27.
RENDER vs ICP — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-27T12:16:05
| RENDER | ICP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.66 | $2.57 |
| Market cap | $933.19M | $1.90B |
| 24h volume | $599.42K DEX | $979.59K DEX |
| Liquidity | $331.88K | $316.44K |
| FDV | $933.19M | $810.69K |
| Holders | 125,921 | 6,579 |
| Age (days) | — | 335 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- ICP measures ~2.0× the market cap of RENDER
- ICP measures ~1.6× the 24h volume of RENDER
- RENDER measures ~19× the holder count of ICP
What the data says
RENDER
RENDER is the token of Render Network, the distributed GPU-rendering marketplace — one of the largest projects with a Solana-native token since its 2023 migration from Ethereum, and by far the biggest name on this page's list that most readers will already know. The October 6, 2026 snapshot reads roughly $933 million of market capitalization with 125,921 holders on this chain, mint rndrizKT3MK1iimdxRdWabcF7Zg7AR5T4nud4EkHBof.
Honesty about what this snapshot resolved: the mint and freeze authority flags both came back unconfirmed — recorded as unknown, not assumed clean and not assumed live. A migrated, upgrade-managed token like RENDER runs its issuance through program machinery rather than a bare SPL switch, which is often why a simple flag read does not resolve. The scanner above performs the direct read in seconds; do that before relying on either flag, and see the authority guide for what each switch would mean.
ICP
ICP at 0x00f3c42833c3170159af4e92dbb451fb3f708917 is a wrapped claim on the Internet Computer token trading on Base, 320 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $1.9 billion market cap dwarfs the $810.7 thousand fully-diluted figure priced on 275.6 thousand local units — a thin slice of a billion-dollar asset.
The local book is thin against the headline but the tape is hot: $316.4 thousand of tracked depth on $1.1 million of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling itself multiple times a day through routed flow. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RENDER or ICP?
By tracked market cap: RENDER (Solana) measures $933.19M and ICP (Base) measures $1.90B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RENDER or ICP?
On the contract checks we publish: RENDER (Solana) grades A and ICP (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RENDER and ICP performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-27T12:16:05, the measured snapshots show RENDER at −11.0% and ICP at −13.1%.
More comparisons
HLX vs RENDERRAIN vs RENDERRENDER vs VIRTUALCRV vs RENDERICP vs VIRTUALICP vs GRASSHLX vs ICPRAIN vs ICP
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-27T12:16:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.