HostICP vs GRASS — price, size and safety, side by side
ICP (Base) vs GRASS (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-27 / 2026-10-27.
ICP vs GRASS — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-27T12:16:05
| ICP | GRASS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2.57 | $0.6691 |
| Market cap | $1.90B | $509.46M |
| 24h volume | $979.59K DEX | $4.06M DEX |
| Liquidity | $316.44K | $292.72K |
| FDV | $810.69K | $509.46M |
| Holders | 6,579 | 380,863 |
| Age (days) | 335 | — |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- ICP measures ~3.7× the market cap of GRASS
- GRASS measures ~4.1× the 24h volume of ICP
- GRASS measures ~58× the holder count of ICP
- over the shared window ICP moved −13.1% while GRASS moved +54.2%
What the data says
ICP
ICP at 0x00f3c42833c3170159af4e92dbb451fb3f708917 is a wrapped claim on the Internet Computer token trading on Base, 320 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $1.9 billion market cap dwarfs the $810.7 thousand fully-diluted figure priced on 275.6 thousand local units — a thin slice of a billion-dollar asset.
The local book is thin against the headline but the tape is hot: $316.4 thousand of tracked depth on $1.1 million of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling itself multiple times a day through routed flow. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
GRASS
GRASS pays people for something they didn't know they could sell: idle internet bandwidth. Users run a browser extension or node, the network routes web-scraping traffic through their residential connections — primarily to gather training data for AI companies — and rewards flow back in tokens. It's one of the cleaner product stories in the DePIN category, and after an October 2024 airdrop to early node-runners, the token at mint Grass7B4RdKfBCjTKgSqnXkqjwiGvQyFbuSCUJr3XXjs reaches roughly $509.5 million of market capitalization across 380,863 holders in NexFlow's October 6, 2026 snapshot.
Structure: freeze authority revoked, so no one can lock holders out of selling; the creator-associated wallet share reads effectively zero; and the mint authority is not fully retired in this snapshot — consistent with a token whose supply still has scheduled distribution ahead of it (rewards, ecosystem, and investor allocations vesting on public timetables). That's the normal shape for a venture-backed network token, and it means future float growth is a calendar fact to price in rather than a surprise to fear.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ICP or GRASS?
By tracked market cap: ICP (Base) measures $1.90B and GRASS (Solana) measures $509.46M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ICP or GRASS?
On the contract checks we publish: ICP (Base) grades B and GRASS (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ICP and GRASS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-27T12:16:05, the measured snapshots show ICP at −13.1% and GRASS at +54.2%.
More comparisons
ICP vs VIRTUALRENDER vs ICPHLX vs ICPRAIN vs ICPVIRTUAL vs GRASSRENDER vs GRASSGRASS vs AAVE.EHLX vs GRASS
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-27T12:16:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.