HostRENDER vs ETHFI — price, size and safety, side by side
RENDER (Solana) vs ETHFI (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-14.
RENDER vs ETHFI — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-14T21:16:23
| RENDER | ETHFI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.36 | $0.4801 |
| Market cap | $765.04M | $580.04M |
| 24h volume | $36.06M all venues | $55.15M all venues |
| Liquidity | $196.37K | $168.83K |
| FDV | $765.04M | $4.42M |
| Holders | 129,255 | 23,619 |
| Age (days) | — | 21 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- ETHFI measures ~1.5× the 24h volume of RENDER
- RENDER measures ~5.5× the holder count of ETHFI
- over the shared window RENDER moved −26.7% while ETHFI moved −36.3%
What the data says
RENDER
RENDER is the token of Render Network, the distributed GPU-rendering marketplace — one of the largest projects with a Solana-native token since its 2023 migration from Ethereum, and by far the biggest name on this page's list that most readers will already know. The November 6, 2026 snapshot reads roughly $765 million of market capitalization with 129,255 holders on this chain, mint rndrizKT3MK1iimdxRdWabcF7Zg7AR5T4nud4EkHBof.
Honesty about what this snapshot resolved: the mint and freeze authority flags both came back unconfirmed — recorded as unknown, not assumed clean and not assumed live. A migrated, upgrade-managed token like RENDER runs its issuance through program machinery rather than a bare SPL switch, which is often why a simple flag read does not resolve. The scanner above performs the direct read in seconds; do that before relying on either flag, and see the authority guide for what each switch would mean.
ETHFI
ETHFI at 0x7189fb5b6504bbff6a852b13b7b82a3c118fdc27 is ether.fi's governance token on Arbitrum — a record only six days old at the November 6, 2026 snapshot, one of the youngest books in the tracked corpus. The asset-wide $580.0 million market cap towers over the $4.4 million fully-diluted figure priced on 7.5 million local units.
The week-old book is thin but trading: $168.8 thousand of tracked depth on $58.2 thousand of 24-hour volume. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RENDER or ETHFI?
By tracked market cap: RENDER (Solana) measures $765.04M and ETHFI (Arbitrum) measures $580.04M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RENDER or ETHFI?
On the contract checks we publish: RENDER (Solana) grades A and ETHFI (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RENDER and ETHFI performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-14T21:16:23, the measured snapshots show RENDER at −26.7% and ETHFI at −36.3%.
More comparisons
AAVE.E vs RENDERUVM vs RENDERRENDER vs GRASSRENDER vs ZROETHFI vs ZROGRASS vs ETHFIETHFI vs FFETHFI vs CAT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-14T21:16:23; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.