Open app

UVM vs AAVE.E — price, size and safety, side by side

UVM (Polygon) vs AAVE.E (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.

UVMA

$0.3618
Universe Meta on Polygon
Trade UVM
vs

AAVE.EC

$105.90
Aave Token on Avalanche
Trade AAVE.E

UVM vs AAVE.E — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30

100 — shared start
UVM −8.44%  ·  AAVE.E −28.3% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
UVMAAVE.E
Price$0.3618$105.90
Market cap$766.92M$2.01B
24h volume$9.07K DEX$303.80M all venues
Liquidity$211.78K$204.75K
FDV$673.82M$996.15K
Holders2,8589,014
Age (days)6011,838
Safety gradeAC

Where they differ

What the data says

UVM

UVM — Universe Meta — is a 601-day-old Polygon token at 0x6966fec28ae7f598bd29c788def80f56ffa12de9, and it carries the batch's widest cap-to-book gap: a $766.9 million market cap against $211.8 thousand of tracked pool liquidity on the October 31, 2026 snapshot.

The page's own flag says it plainly: the pool is large in dollars but thin against the token's own cap — an exit has to be sized against the pool, not the headline. The tape is quiet besides: $7.0 thousand of daily volume says the cap sits still rather than trades. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.

Full UVM safety read →

AAVE.E

AAVE.E at 0x63a72806098bd3d9520cc43356dd78afe5d386d9 is the legacy Avalanche Bridge deployment of the Aave governance token, 1,820 days into its record at the November 6, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $2.0 billion market cap dwarfs the $996 thousand fully-diluted figure priced on 7.8 thousand local units.

The local book is thin and the tape modest: $204.8 thousand of tracked depth on $89.1 thousand of 24-hour volume. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.

Full AAVE.E safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, UVM or AAVE.E?

By tracked market cap: UVM (Polygon) measures $766.92M and AAVE.E (Avalanche) measures $2.01B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, UVM or AAVE.E?

On the contract checks we publish: UVM (Polygon) grades A and AAVE.E (Avalanche) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have UVM and AAVE.E performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show UVM at −8.44% and AAVE.E at −28.3%.

More comparisons

SOLVBTC vs UVMUVM vs RENDERICP vs UVMUVM vs GRASSAAVE.E vs RENDERSOLVBTC vs AAVE.EICP vs AAVE.EAAVE.E vs GRASS

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.