Open app

ICP vs AAVE.E — price, size and safety, side by side

ICP (Base) vs AAVE.E (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-27 / 2026-10-27.

ICPB

$2.57
ICP on Base
Trade ICP
vs

AAVE.EC

$132.87
Aave Token on Avalanche
Trade AAVE.E

ICP vs AAVE.E — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-27T12:16:05

100 — shared start
ICP −13.1%  ·  AAVE.E −10.0% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
ICPAAVE.E
Price$2.57$132.87
Market cap$1.90B$2.60B
24h volume$979.59K DEX$16.41K DEX
Liquidity$316.44K$248.45K
FDV$810.69K$1.30M
Holders6,5799,014
Age (days)3351,838
Safety gradeBC

Where they differ

What the data says

ICP

ICP at 0x00f3c42833c3170159af4e92dbb451fb3f708917 is a wrapped claim on the Internet Computer token trading on Base, 320 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $1.9 billion market cap dwarfs the $810.7 thousand fully-diluted figure priced on 275.6 thousand local units — a thin slice of a billion-dollar asset.

The local book is thin against the headline but the tape is hot: $316.4 thousand of tracked depth on $1.1 million of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling itself multiple times a day through routed flow. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.

Full ICP safety read →

AAVE.E

AAVE.E at 0x63a72806098bd3d9520cc43356dd78afe5d386d9 is the legacy Avalanche Bridge deployment of the Aave governance token, 1,820 days into its record at the October 9, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $2.6 billion market cap dwarfs the $1.3 million fully-diluted figure priced on 7.8 thousand local units.

The local book is thin and the tape modest: $248.5 thousand of tracked depth on $89.1 thousand of 24-hour volume. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.

Full AAVE.E safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, ICP or AAVE.E?

By tracked market cap: ICP (Base) measures $1.90B and AAVE.E (Avalanche) measures $2.60B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, ICP or AAVE.E?

On the contract checks we publish: ICP (Base) grades B and AAVE.E (Avalanche) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have ICP and AAVE.E performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-27T12:16:05, the measured snapshots show ICP at −13.1% and AAVE.E at −10.0%.

More comparisons

ICP vs VIRTUALRENDER vs ICPICP vs GRASSHLX vs ICPAAVE.E vs SOLVBTCGRASS vs AAVE.EAAVE.E vs ETHFIVIRTUAL vs AAVE.E

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-27T12:16:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.