HostESP vs ORDER — price, size and safety, side by side
ESP (Arbitrum) vs ORDER (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
ESP vs ORDER — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| ESP | ORDER | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1052 | $0.04227 |
| Market cap | $71.56M | $17.30M |
| 24h volume | $542.49K | $16.27K |
| Liquidity | $129.54K | $120.66K |
| FDV | $7.86M | $466.73K |
| Holders | 3,284 | 6,656 |
| Age (days) | 222 | 431 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- ESP measures ~4.1× the market cap of ORDER
- ESP measures ~33× the 24h volume of ORDER
- ORDER measures ~2.0× the holder count of ESP
What the data says
ESP
ESP is the token of Espresso Systems — the shared-sequencing and confirmation network built for rollups, launched with a live technical product rather than a roadmap. The contract 0x3b8db18e69d6686ad9371a423afe3dd1065c94f1 is what our scan tracks: $130 thousand of pool liquidity as of September 27, 2026 on Arbitrum.
The honest thesis: Espresso sells fast confirmations and decentralized sequencing to a rollup economy that mostly still runs centralized sequencers — a real product pointed at a real problem. The caution is that the market it serves is still forming: rollup teams have to choose to integrate, and the token's value case rides on that adoption curve more than on present cash flows.
ORDER
ORDER at 0x4e200fe2f3efb977d5fd9c430a41531fb04d97b8 is the Arbitrum deployment of Orderly Network's token, 431 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $17.3 million market cap sits far above a $466.7 thousand fully-diluted figure priced on 11.3 million local units.
The local book is thin for the headline: $120.7 thousand of tracked depth on $32.5 thousand of 24-hour volume — a working but modest slice. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ESP or ORDER?
By tracked market cap: ESP (Arbitrum) measures $71.56M and ORDER (Arbitrum) measures $17.30M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ESP or ORDER?
On the contract checks we publish: ESP (Arbitrum) grades B and ORDER (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ESP and ORDER performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show ESP at +10.1% and ORDER at +7.62%.
More comparisons
ESP vs KETESP vs EVAABMT vs ESPESP vs ALTSZNORDER vs LDOFALX vs ORDERORDER vs CWUHARAMBE vs ORDER
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.