HostBMT vs ESP — price, size and safety, side by side
BMT (Solana) vs ESP (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
BMT vs ESP — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| BMT | ESP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0199 | $0.1036 |
| Market cap | $10.22M | $71.56M |
| 24h volume | $35.31K | $542.49K |
| Liquidity | $129.68K | $129.54K |
| FDV | $10.22M | $7.86M |
| Holders | 5,938 | 3,284 |
| Age (days) | — | 222 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- ESP measures ~7.0× the market cap of BMT
- ESP measures ~15× the 24h volume of BMT
- BMT measures ~1.8× the holder count of ESP
- over the shared window BMT moved +10.1% while ESP moved +40.1%
What the data says
BMT
BMT is the token of Bubblemaps — the on-chain visualization tool that maps wallet clusters and supply concentration, a genuinely used piece of crypto analytics. The mint FQgtfugBdpFN7PZ6NdPrZpVLDBrPGxXesi4gVu3vErhY is what our scan tracks: $10.2 million market cap, $130 thousand of liquidity and 5,938 holders as of September 26, 2026.
The honest read: Bubblemaps is one of the few tokens here whose product you have probably already used — wallet-cluster maps are embedded across crypto tooling. The token's value case ties to monetizing that product surface, which is still developing, so this trades as an analytics-platform bet with a mid-cap liquidity profile to match.
ESP
ESP is the token of Espresso Systems — the shared-sequencing and confirmation network built for rollups, launched with a live technical product rather than a roadmap. The contract 0x3b8db18e69d6686ad9371a423afe3dd1065c94f1 is what our scan tracks: $130 thousand of pool liquidity as of September 27, 2026 on Arbitrum.
The honest thesis: Espresso sells fast confirmations and decentralized sequencing to a rollup economy that mostly still runs centralized sequencers — a real product pointed at a real problem. The caution is that the market it serves is still forming: rollup teams have to choose to integrate, and the token's value case rides on that adoption curve more than on present cash flows.
FAQ
Which is bigger, BMT or ESP?
By tracked market cap: BMT (Solana) measures $10.22M and ESP (Arbitrum) measures $71.56M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, BMT or ESP?
On the contract checks we publish: BMT (Solana) grades A and ESP (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have BMT and ESP performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show BMT at +10.1% and ESP at +40.1%.
More comparisons
BMT vs KETBMT vs EVAABITTY vs BMTBMT vs ALTSZNESP vs KETESP vs EVAAESP vs ALTSZNBITTY vs ESP
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.