HostESP vs KET — price, size and safety, side by side
ESP (Arbitrum) vs KET (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
ESP vs KET — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| ESP | KET | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1036 | $0.001595 |
| Market cap | $71.56M | $1.59M |
| 24h volume | $542.49K | $566.64 |
| Liquidity | $129.54K | $140.56K |
| FDV | $7.86M | $1.59M |
| Holders | 3,284 | 32,354 |
| Age (days) | 222 | 614 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- ESP measures ~45× the market cap of KET
- ESP measures ~957× the 24h volume of KET
- KET measures ~9.9× the holder count of ESP
- over the shared window ESP moved +8.45% while KET moved −24.0%
What the data says
ESP
ESP is the token of Espresso Systems — the shared-sequencing and confirmation network built for rollups, launched with a live technical product rather than a roadmap. The contract 0x3b8db18e69d6686ad9371a423afe3dd1065c94f1 is what our scan tracks: $130 thousand of pool liquidity as of September 27, 2026 on Arbitrum.
The honest thesis: Espresso sells fast confirmations and decentralized sequencing to a rollup economy that mostly still runs centralized sequencers — a real product pointed at a real problem. The caution is that the market it serves is still forming: rollup teams have to choose to integrate, and the token's value case rides on that adoption curve more than on present cash flows.
KET
KET at 0xffff003a6bad9b743d658048742935fffe2b6ed7 is an Avalanche community token 614 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $1.6 million market cap across a 1.0 billion supply.
The book is deep for the cap and the tape healthy: $140.6 thousand of tracked depth on $65.8 thousand of 24-hour volume — a pool proportionate to the small valuation, cycling itself daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ESP or KET?
By tracked market cap: ESP (Arbitrum) measures $71.56M and KET (Avalanche) measures $1.59M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ESP or KET?
On the contract checks we publish: ESP (Arbitrum) grades B and KET (Avalanche) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ESP and KET performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show ESP at +8.45% and KET at −24.0%.
More comparisons
ESP vs EVAABMT vs ESPESP vs ALTSZNBITTY vs ESPBURNIE vs KETWLD vs KET9QRI vs KETKET vs AMD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.