HostESP vs EVAA — price, size and safety, side by side
ESP (Arbitrum) vs EVAA (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
ESP vs EVAA — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| ESP | EVAA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1036 | $0.6877 |
| Market cap | $71.56M | $4.46M |
| 24h volume | $542.49K | $1.11M |
| Liquidity | $129.54K | $129.44K |
| FDV | $7.86M | $20.34M |
| Holders | 3,284 | 25,533 |
| Age (days) | 222 | 354 |
| Safety grade | B | C |
Where they differ
- ESP measures ~16× the market cap of EVAA
- EVAA measures ~2.0× the 24h volume of ESP
- EVAA measures ~7.8× the holder count of ESP
- over the shared window ESP moved +11.0% while EVAA moved +1.42%
What the data says
ESP
ESP is the token of Espresso Systems — the shared-sequencing and confirmation network built for rollups, launched with a live technical product rather than a roadmap. The contract 0x3b8db18e69d6686ad9371a423afe3dd1065c94f1 is what our scan tracks: $130 thousand of pool liquidity as of September 27, 2026 on Arbitrum.
The honest thesis: Espresso sells fast confirmations and decentralized sequencing to a rollup economy that mostly still runs centralized sequencers — a real product pointed at a real problem. The caution is that the market it serves is still forming: rollup teams have to choose to integrate, and the token's value case rides on that adoption curve more than on present cash flows.
EVAA
EVAA at 0xaa036928c9c0df07d525b55ea8ee690bb5a628c1 is a BNB Chain deployment of the EVAA lending protocol's token, 354 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot. The $4.5 million market cap prices barely a fifth of the $20.3 million fully-diluted figure on 30.0 million units.
The book is workable and the tape is loud: $129.4 thousand of tracked depth on $1.1 million of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling itself nearly ten times daily, routed flow far above the book. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ESP or EVAA?
By tracked market cap: ESP (Arbitrum) measures $71.56M and EVAA (BNB Chain) measures $4.46M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ESP or EVAA?
On the contract checks we publish: ESP (Arbitrum) grades B and EVAA (BNB Chain) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ESP and EVAA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show ESP at +11.0% and EVAA at +1.42%.
More comparisons
ESP vs KETBMT vs ESPESP vs ALTSZNBITTY vs ESPKET vs EVAABMT vs EVAAEVAA vs ALTSZNBITTY vs EVAA
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.