HostBMT vs KET — price, size and safety, side by side
BMT (Solana) vs KET (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
BMT vs KET — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| BMT | KET | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0199 | $0.001595 |
| Market cap | $10.22M | $1.59M |
| 24h volume | $35.31K | $566.64 |
| Liquidity | $129.68K | $140.56K |
| FDV | $10.22M | $1.59M |
| Holders | 5,938 | 32,354 |
| Age (days) | — | 614 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- BMT measures ~6.4× the market cap of KET
- BMT measures ~62× the 24h volume of KET
- KET measures ~5.4× the holder count of BMT
- over the shared window BMT moved −0.52% while KET moved −24.0%
What the data says
BMT
BMT is the token of Bubblemaps — the on-chain visualization tool that maps wallet clusters and supply concentration, a genuinely used piece of crypto analytics. The mint FQgtfugBdpFN7PZ6NdPrZpVLDBrPGxXesi4gVu3vErhY is what our scan tracks: $10.2 million market cap, $130 thousand of liquidity and 5,938 holders as of September 26, 2026.
The honest read: Bubblemaps is one of the few tokens here whose product you have probably already used — wallet-cluster maps are embedded across crypto tooling. The token's value case ties to monetizing that product surface, which is still developing, so this trades as an analytics-platform bet with a mid-cap liquidity profile to match.
KET
KET at 0xffff003a6bad9b743d658048742935fffe2b6ed7 is an Avalanche community token 614 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $1.6 million market cap across a 1.0 billion supply.
The book is deep for the cap and the tape healthy: $140.6 thousand of tracked depth on $65.8 thousand of 24-hour volume — a pool proportionate to the small valuation, cycling itself daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, BMT or KET?
By tracked market cap: BMT (Solana) measures $10.22M and KET (Avalanche) measures $1.59M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, BMT or KET?
On the contract checks we publish: BMT (Solana) grades A and KET (Avalanche) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have BMT and KET performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show BMT at −0.52% and KET at −24.0%.
More comparisons
BMT vs ESPBMT vs EVAABITTY vs BMTBMT vs ALTSZNBURNIE vs KETWLD vs KET9QRI vs KETKET vs AMD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.