HostORDER vs LDO — price, size and safety, side by side
ORDER (Arbitrum) vs LDO (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
ORDER vs LDO — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| ORDER | LDO | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.04227 | $0.4846 |
| Market cap | $17.30M | $402.01M |
| 24h volume | $16.27K | $409.00K |
| Liquidity | $120.66K | $1.09M |
| FDV | $466.73K | $484.61M |
| Holders | 6,656 | 63,889 |
| Age (days) | 431 | 1,561 |
| Safety grade | B | C |
Where they differ
- LDO measures ~23× the market cap of ORDER
- LDO measures ~9.0× the liquidity of ORDER
- LDO measures ~25× the 24h volume of ORDER
- LDO measures ~9.6× the holder count of ORDER
What the data says
ORDER
ORDER at 0x4e200fe2f3efb977d5fd9c430a41531fb04d97b8 is the Arbitrum deployment of Orderly Network's token, 431 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $17.3 million market cap sits far above a $466.7 thousand fully-diluted figure priced on 11.3 million local units.
The local book is thin for the headline: $120.7 thousand of tracked depth on $32.5 thousand of 24-hour volume — a working but modest slice. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
LDO
LDO is Lido DAO's governance token — the vote share over the largest staking pool in crypto, the operator set behind stETH and wstETH (both covered separately in this corpus). The contract 0x5a98fcbea516cf06857215779fd812ca3bef1b32 is the canonical deployment; our September 27, 2026 read shows $1.1 million of tracked pool liquidity at a $0.39 handle.
The honest mechanics: LDO is governance, not cash flow — it doesn't pay you a share of Lido's fee revenue, it buys influence over who gets to run validators and what the treasury does. Its risk is its dominance: Lido's share of staked ETH is large enough that regulators and the Ethereum community itself periodically debate capping it, and that debate is the LDO chart. A governance token on the biggest single point of staking centralization is a strange asset — know that is what it is.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ORDER or LDO?
By tracked market cap: ORDER (Arbitrum) measures $17.30M and LDO (Ethereum) measures $402.01M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ORDER or LDO?
On the contract checks we publish: ORDER (Arbitrum) grades B and LDO (Ethereum) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ORDER and LDO performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show ORDER at +7.62% and LDO at +9.81%.
More comparisons
FALX vs ORDERORDER vs CWUHARAMBE vs ORDERGRND vs ORDERCRED vs LDOAKE vs LDOLDO vs AURALDO vs BAS
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.