HostFALX vs ORDER — price, size and safety, side by side
FALX (Solana) vs ORDER (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
FALX vs ORDER — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| FALX | ORDER | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0000154 | $0.04227 |
| Market cap | $154.57K | $17.30M |
| 24h volume | $100.59 | $16.27K |
| Liquidity | $121.04K | $120.66K |
| FDV | $154.57K | $466.73K |
| Holders | 21,900 | 6,656 |
| Age (days) | — | 431 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- ORDER measures ~112× the market cap of FALX
- ORDER measures ~162× the 24h volume of FALX
- FALX measures ~3.3× the holder count of ORDER
- over the shared window FALX moved +2.49% while ORDER moved +7.62%
What the data says
FALX
FALX — "FalconX" on Solana, mint Afo4NumBNHDXc7m7p6qjZ1pF3LbqYfG5k1CNrGve8rVu — is a memecoin whose name collides with a real institutional crypto prime broker. Nothing in the record connects this token to that company; the name is borrowed gravity. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $155 thousand across a huge 21,900-holder file.
That file shape is the inverse extreme of the cohort: ~$6 of cap per wallet on nearly ten billion units — a dusted-out distribution left after the trading phase ended. $121 thousand of pool liquidity actually exceeds 78% of the whole market cap — liquidity that now dwarfs the value of what it prices.
ORDER
ORDER at 0x4e200fe2f3efb977d5fd9c430a41531fb04d97b8 is the Arbitrum deployment of Orderly Network's token, 431 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $17.3 million market cap sits far above a $466.7 thousand fully-diluted figure priced on 11.3 million local units.
The local book is thin for the headline: $120.7 thousand of tracked depth on $32.5 thousand of 24-hour volume — a working but modest slice. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FALX or ORDER?
By tracked market cap: FALX (Solana) measures $154.57K and ORDER (Arbitrum) measures $17.30M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FALX or ORDER?
On the contract checks we publish: FALX (Solana) grades A and ORDER (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FALX and ORDER performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show FALX at +2.49% and ORDER at +7.62%.
More comparisons
HARAMBE vs FALXGRND vs FALXRAGEGUY vs FALXFALX vs LDOORDER vs LDOORDER vs CWUHARAMBE vs ORDERGRND vs ORDER
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.