HostWBTC.E vs QI — price, size and safety, side by side
WBTC.E (Avalanche) vs QI (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
WBTC.E vs QI — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| WBTC.E | QI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $84.90K | $0.003043 |
| Market cap | $26.68M | $21.91M |
| 24h volume | $33.51K | $329.99K |
| Liquidity | $391.40K | $252.82K |
| FDV | $26.68M | $21.91M |
| Holders | 8,989 | 39,637 |
| Age (days) | 1,820 | 1,820 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- WBTC.E measures ~1.5× the liquidity of QI
- QI measures ~9.8× the 24h volume of WBTC.E
- QI measures ~4.4× the holder count of WBTC.E
- over the shared window WBTC.E moved +1.13% while QI moved +116%
What the data says
WBTC.E
WBTC.E at 0x50b7545627a5162f82a992c33b87adc75187b218 is the legacy bridge's wrapped bitcoin on Avalanche — the ".e" suffix marking the original Avalanche Bridge mint, distinguished from the newer BTC.b deployment — 1,820 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot and priced at a $26.7 million market cap on 315 local units.
The book is workable and the tape alive five years in: $391.4 thousand of tracked depth on $165.7 thousand of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling near half itself daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
QI
QI at 0x8729438eb15e2c8b576fcc6aecda6a148776c0f5 is BENQI's governance token — Avalanche's original money-market protocol — 1,820 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot and priced at a $21.9 million market cap across a 7.2 billion supply.
The book is workable and the tape alive five years in: $252.8 thousand of tracked depth on $45.8 thousand of 24-hour volume — a real protocol-token pool, not a listing stub. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WBTC.E or QI?
By tracked market cap: WBTC.E (Avalanche) measures $26.68M and QI (Avalanche) measures $21.91M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WBTC.E or QI?
On the contract checks we publish: WBTC.E (Avalanche) grades B and QI (Avalanche) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WBTC.E and QI performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show WBTC.E at +1.13% and QI at +116%.
More comparisons
ZCAT vs WBTC.EWBTC.E vs XHYPEMCDX vs WBTC.EWBTC.E vs GEODQI vs STRCXCYBERLEEK vs QIQI vs AAVE.ENODAL vs QI
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.