HostCYBERLEEK vs QI — price, size and safety, side by side
CYBERLEEK (Solana) vs QI (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
CYBERLEEK vs QI — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| CYBERLEEK | QI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.001693 | $0.003043 |
| Market cap | $758.43K | $21.91M |
| 24h volume | $48.40K | $329.99K |
| Liquidity | $253.32K | $252.82K |
| FDV | $758.43K | $21.91M |
| Holders | 49,088 | 39,637 |
| Age (days) | — | 1,820 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- QI measures ~29× the market cap of CYBERLEEK
- QI measures ~6.8× the 24h volume of CYBERLEEK
- over the shared window CYBERLEEK moved +68.0% while QI moved +116%
What the data says
CYBERLEEK
CYBERLEEK is a Solana memecoin. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $758.4 thousand across 49,088 wallets on mint ApZuxdpzMrbEYTGEzeY9afh5pj9d6qPRJCTgQYiipbKg.
Fifty thousand wallets against a ~$390K cap is the wide-shallow distribution common to memecoins past their launch cycle — broad reach in wallets, thin economic weight. There is no utility claim behind the name; the community is the asset.
QI
QI at 0x8729438eb15e2c8b576fcc6aecda6a148776c0f5 is BENQI's governance token — Avalanche's original money-market protocol — 1,820 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot and priced at a $21.9 million market cap across a 7.2 billion supply.
The book is workable and the tape alive five years in: $252.8 thousand of tracked depth on $45.8 thousand of 24-hour volume — a real protocol-token pool, not a listing stub. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CYBERLEEK or QI?
By tracked market cap: CYBERLEEK (Solana) measures $758.43K and QI (Avalanche) measures $21.91M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CYBERLEEK or QI?
On the contract checks we publish: CYBERLEEK (Solana) grades A and QI (Avalanche) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CYBERLEEK and QI performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show CYBERLEEK at +68.0% and QI at +116%.
More comparisons
CYBERLEEK vs STRCXCYBERLEEK vs AAVE.ENODAL vs CYBERLEEKCYBERLEEK vs CHILLHOUSEQI vs STRCXQI vs AAVE.ENODAL vs QIQI vs CHILLHOUSE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.