HostQI vs CHILLHOUSE — price, size and safety, side by side
QI (Avalanche) vs CHILLHOUSE (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
QI vs CHILLHOUSE — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| QI | CHILLHOUSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.003043 | $0.001686 |
| Market cap | $21.91M | $1.51M |
| 24h volume | $329.99K | $314.19K |
| Liquidity | $252.82K | $248.62K |
| FDV | $21.91M | $1.51M |
| Holders | 39,637 | 19,117 |
| Age (days) | 1,820 | — |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- QI measures ~14× the market cap of CHILLHOUSE
- QI measures ~2.1× the holder count of CHILLHOUSE
- over the shared window QI moved +116% while CHILLHOUSE moved −23.7%
What the data says
QI
QI at 0x8729438eb15e2c8b576fcc6aecda6a148776c0f5 is BENQI's governance token — Avalanche's original money-market protocol — 1,820 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot and priced at a $21.9 million market cap across a 7.2 billion supply.
The book is workable and the tape alive five years in: $252.8 thousand of tracked depth on $45.8 thousand of 24-hour volume — a real protocol-token pool, not a listing stub. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
CHILLHOUSE
CHILLHOUSE — Chill House, mint GkyPYa7NnCFbduLknCfBfP7p8564X1VZhwZYJ6CZpump — is a pump.fun graduate (the `pump` suffix on the mint is the launchpad's signature) that kept 19,117 holders after bonding out. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $1.5 million of capitalization on $249 thousand of liquidity.
The pump.fun origin is worth reading both ways. It means a fair-launch curve — no presale allocation to insiders, supply distributed through the curve — which is structurally cleaner than most launches. It also means the token was born in the highest-churn nursery in crypto, where most graduates die in days; surviving with nearly twenty thousand holders and a seven-figure cap is the upper tail of that distribution.
FAQ
Which is bigger, QI or CHILLHOUSE?
By tracked market cap: QI (Avalanche) measures $21.91M and CHILLHOUSE (Solana) measures $1.51M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, QI or CHILLHOUSE?
On the contract checks we publish: QI (Avalanche) grades A and CHILLHOUSE (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have QI and CHILLHOUSE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show QI at +116% and CHILLHOUSE at −23.7%.
More comparisons
QI vs STRCXCYBERLEEK vs QIQI vs AAVE.ENODAL vs QICHILLHOUSE vs GOLDCHILLHOUSE vs ARIAAAVE.E vs CHILLHOUSECHILLHOUSE vs CUPSEY
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.