HostQI vs STRCX — price, size and safety, side by side
QI (Avalanche) vs STRCX (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
QI vs STRCX — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| QI | STRCX | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.003043 | $98.73 |
| Market cap | $21.91M | $50.31M |
| 24h volume | $329.99K | $987.55K |
| Liquidity | $252.82K | $252.76K |
| FDV | $21.91M | $50.31M |
| Holders | 39,637 | 4,752 |
| Age (days) | 1,820 | — |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- STRCX measures ~2.3× the market cap of QI
- STRCX measures ~3.0× the 24h volume of QI
- QI measures ~8.3× the holder count of STRCX
- over the shared window QI moved +116% while STRCX moved −0.32%
What the data says
QI
QI at 0x8729438eb15e2c8b576fcc6aecda6a148776c0f5 is BENQI's governance token — Avalanche's original money-market protocol — 1,820 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot and priced at a $21.9 million market cap across a 7.2 billion supply.
The book is workable and the tape alive five years in: $252.8 thousand of tracked depth on $45.8 thousand of 24-hour volume — a real protocol-token pool, not a listing stub. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
STRCX
STRCX is the xStock for Strategy's perpetual preferred shares — Backed Finance's tokenized wrapper on STRC/STRF, the variable-rate preferred that MicroStrategy issues to fund its bitcoin buying. The mint Xs78JED6PFZxWc2wCEPspZW9kL3Se5J7L5TChKgsidH is what our scan tracks: $50.3 million market cap, $253 thousand of pool liquidity, 4,752 holders as of September 26, 2026.
The honest shape: you are holding a tokenized claim on a preferred share of a company that is itself a leveraged bitcoin vehicle — a yield instrument on a crypto proxy, wrapped for 24/7 Solana trading. Standard xStock caveats (issuer custody, off-hours gap) apply; the preferred's variable dividend adds a rate layer most equity tokens don't have.
FAQ
Which is bigger, QI or STRCX?
By tracked market cap: QI (Avalanche) measures $21.91M and STRCX (Solana) measures $50.31M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, QI or STRCX?
On the contract checks we publish: QI (Avalanche) grades A and STRCX (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have QI and STRCX performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show QI at +116% and STRCX at −0.32%.
More comparisons
CYBERLEEK vs QIQI vs AAVE.ENODAL vs QIQI vs CHILLHOUSECYBERLEEK vs STRCXSTRCX vs AAVE.ENODAL vs STRCXSTRCX vs CHILLHOUSE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.