HostMCDX vs WBTC.E — price, size and safety, side by side
MCDX (Solana) vs WBTC.E (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
MCDX vs WBTC.E — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| MCDX | WBTC.E | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $234.91 | $84.90K |
| Market cap | $13.41M | $26.68M |
| 24h volume | $1.21M | $33.51K |
| Liquidity | $395.32K | $391.40K |
| FDV | $13.41M | $26.68M |
| Holders | 21,949 | 8,989 |
| Age (days) | — | 1,820 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- WBTC.E measures ~2.0× the market cap of MCDX
- MCDX measures ~36× the 24h volume of WBTC.E
- MCDX measures ~2.4× the holder count of WBTC.E
- over the shared window MCDX moved −5.24% while WBTC.E moved +1.13%
What the data says
MCDX
MCDX is the xStock for McDonald's — Backed Finance's tokenized wrapper for the fast-food bellwether. The mint XsqE9cRRpzxcGKDXj1BJ7Xmg4GRhZoyY1KpmGSxAWT2 is what our scan tracks: $13.4 million market cap, $395 thousand of liquidity and 21,949 holders as of September 26, 2026 — the best liquidity-to-cap ratio in the whole xStock line.
The underlying is a defensive low-beta name, and the pool depth here actually matches the cap — a combination that makes MCDX the most tradable xStock in the corpus despite being one of the smaller ones. Family caveats hold: Backed custody under the hood, after-hours quoting, and dividends are part of MCD's total return — confirm how the issuer passes them through.
WBTC.E
WBTC.E at 0x50b7545627a5162f82a992c33b87adc75187b218 is the legacy bridge's wrapped bitcoin on Avalanche — the ".e" suffix marking the original Avalanche Bridge mint, distinguished from the newer BTC.b deployment — 1,820 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot and priced at a $26.7 million market cap on 315 local units.
The book is workable and the tape alive five years in: $391.4 thousand of tracked depth on $165.7 thousand of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling near half itself daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MCDX or WBTC.E?
By tracked market cap: MCDX (Solana) measures $13.41M and WBTC.E (Avalanche) measures $26.68M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MCDX or WBTC.E?
On the contract checks we publish: MCDX (Solana) grades B and WBTC.E (Avalanche) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MCDX and WBTC.E performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show MCDX at −5.24% and WBTC.E at +1.13%.
More comparisons
CODEC vs MCDXMCDX vs ZCATVIRTUAL vs MCDXBLACK vs MCDXZCAT vs WBTC.EWBTC.E vs XHYPEWBTC.E vs GEODCODEC vs WBTC.E
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.