HostWBTC.E vs GEOD — price, size and safety, side by side
WBTC.E (Avalanche) vs GEOD (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
WBTC.E vs GEOD — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| WBTC.E | GEOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $84.90K | $0.2657 |
| Market cap | $26.68M | $122.83M |
| 24h volume | $33.51K | $243.54K |
| Liquidity | $391.40K | $803.11K |
| FDV | $26.68M | $255.41M |
| Holders | 8,989 | 16,751 |
| Age (days) | 1,820 | 1,198 |
| Safety grade | B | C |
Where they differ
- GEOD measures ~4.6× the market cap of WBTC.E
- GEOD measures ~2.1× the liquidity of WBTC.E
- GEOD measures ~7.3× the 24h volume of WBTC.E
- GEOD measures ~1.9× the holder count of WBTC.E
- over the shared window WBTC.E moved +1.13% while GEOD moved +6.23%
What the data says
WBTC.E
WBTC.E at 0x50b7545627a5162f82a992c33b87adc75187b218 is the legacy bridge's wrapped bitcoin on Avalanche — the ".e" suffix marking the original Avalanche Bridge mint, distinguished from the newer BTC.b deployment — 1,820 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot and priced at a $26.7 million market cap on 315 local units.
The book is workable and the tape alive five years in: $391.4 thousand of tracked depth on $165.7 thousand of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling near half itself daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
GEOD
GEOD at 0xac0f66379a6d7801d7726d5a943356a172549adb — the Geodnet Token — is the DePIN asset of a decentralized GPS-correction network, 1,198 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The $122.8 million market cap sits against a $255.4 million fully-diluted figure on 1.0 billion units — under half the supply is the priced float.
The exit book is thin against the nine-figure cap: $803.1 thousand of tracked depth on $112.7 thousand of 24-hour volume — a held-token profile where the real distribution happens through network rewards rather than the pool. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WBTC.E or GEOD?
By tracked market cap: WBTC.E (Avalanche) measures $26.68M and GEOD (Polygon) measures $122.83M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WBTC.E or GEOD?
On the contract checks we publish: WBTC.E (Avalanche) grades B and GEOD (Polygon) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WBTC.E and GEOD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show WBTC.E at +1.13% and GEOD at +6.23%.
More comparisons
ZCAT vs WBTC.EWBTC.E vs XHYPEMCDX vs WBTC.ECODEC vs WBTC.EACT vs GEODGEOD vs EUROCIDL vs GEODCOAI vs GEOD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.