HostVIDAX vs EAT — price, size and safety, side by side
VIDAX (Solana) vs EAT (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
VIDAX vs EAT — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| VIDAX | EAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.73 | $0.003912 |
| Market cap | $7.53M | $3.82M |
| 24h volume | $469.77K | $1.02K |
| Liquidity | $28.35K | $28.24K |
| FDV | $7.53M | $3.82M |
| Holders | 4,774 | 15,235 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- VIDAX measures ~2.0× the market cap of EAT
- VIDAX measures ~460× the 24h volume of EAT
- EAT measures ~3.2× the holder count of VIDAX
- over the shared window VIDAX moved −19.7% while EAT moved −4.41%
What the data says
VIDAX
VIDAX — "Vida Global xStock" on Solana, mint XsfCC9VL4DamVGNgdJpfLXB3sBVa158Gbx8sh7NzmTk — claims the "xStock" label — the tokenized-share branding — while carrying a 66.0% dev wallet: two-thirds of supply in one address. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $7.5 million across 4,774 holders, with ~$564 thousand of daily volume on $28 thousand — a 27.7x turnover.
Every flag stacks: a self-applied "xStock" label with no issuer name in the row (real xStocks carry "Backpack Securities"), a dominant dev position, a $7.8M cap on a $20k pool (~390:1), and a 27x turnover book. A real tokenized share would never concentrate supply in a dev wallet — issuance is custodial, not dev-held.
EAT
EAT is the token of 375ai — a Solana DePIN project running edge devices that collect real-world data (traffic, environment) for sale to AI and mapping consumers. The mint 375aiUqZERLrB9sHtsArKr4nuWCgBrtqibUDBMGeLvZC is what our scan tracks: $3.8 million market cap, $28 thousand of liquidity and 15,235 holders as of September 26, 2026.
The honest DePIN ledger: the contributor network is real — fifteen thousand holders reads as device operators, not just traders — and data-for-AI is a genuine demand thesis. The caution is the same one every DePIN carries: emissions pay contributors before customer revenue matures, so the token front-runs its business. Pool depth is thin for the cap; that is the practical figure.
FAQ
Which is bigger, VIDAX or EAT?
By tracked market cap: VIDAX (Solana) measures $7.53M and EAT (Solana) measures $3.82M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, VIDAX or EAT?
On the contract checks we publish: VIDAX (Solana) grades C and EAT (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have VIDAX and EAT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show VIDAX at −19.7% and EAT at −4.41%.
More comparisons
QTO vs VIDAXSWARM vs VIDAXVIDAX vs NOMVIDAX vs LOOBYEAT vs NOMEAT vs LOOBYEAT vs FEBUQTO vs EAT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.