HostVIDAX vs NOM — price, size and safety, side by side
VIDAX (Solana) vs NOM (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
VIDAX vs NOM — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| VIDAX | NOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.73 | $0.00008426 |
| Market cap | $7.53M | $82.10K |
| 24h volume | $469.77K | $96.35 |
| Liquidity | $28.35K | $28.16K |
| FDV | $7.53M | $82.10K |
| Holders | 4,774 | 2,824 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- VIDAX measures ~92× the market cap of NOM
- VIDAX measures ~4,876× the 24h volume of NOM
- VIDAX measures ~1.7× the holder count of NOM
- over the shared window VIDAX moved −19.7% while NOM moved +19.5%
What the data says
VIDAX
VIDAX — "Vida Global xStock" on Solana, mint XsfCC9VL4DamVGNgdJpfLXB3sBVa158Gbx8sh7NzmTk — claims the "xStock" label — the tokenized-share branding — while carrying a 66.0% dev wallet: two-thirds of supply in one address. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $7.5 million across 4,774 holders, with ~$564 thousand of daily volume on $28 thousand — a 27.7x turnover.
Every flag stacks: a self-applied "xStock" label with no issuer name in the row (real xStocks carry "Backpack Securities"), a dominant dev position, a $7.8M cap on a $20k pool (~390:1), and a 27x turnover book. A real tokenized share would never concentrate supply in a dev wallet — issuance is custodial, not dev-held.
NOM
NOM — "Trust in Nom" on Solana, mint 2MDr15dTn6km3NWusFcnZyhq3vWpYDg7vWprghpzbonk — is a persona meme (@theonlynom) on the bonk.fun launchpad holding 2,824 wallets against a $82 thousand cap.
The September 26, 2026 snapshot shows a $25 thousand pool — nearly a third of the cap — on ~$629 of daily volume. Mint and freeze are both revoked.
FAQ
Which is bigger, VIDAX or NOM?
By tracked market cap: VIDAX (Solana) measures $7.53M and NOM (Solana) measures $82.10K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, VIDAX or NOM?
On the contract checks we publish: VIDAX (Solana) grades C and NOM (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have VIDAX and NOM performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show VIDAX at −19.7% and NOM at +19.5%.
More comparisons
QTO vs VIDAXVIDAX vs EATSWARM vs VIDAXVIDAX vs LOOBYNOM vs LOOBYNOM vs FEBUEAT vs NOMQTO vs NOM
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.