Open app

EAT vs NOM — price, size and safety, side by side

EAT (Solana) vs NOM (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.

EATA

$0.003904
375ai on Solana
Trade EAT
vs

NOMA

$0.00008426
Trust in Nom on Solana
Trade NOM

EAT vs NOM — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38

100 — shared start
EAT −4.61%  ·  NOM +19.5% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
EATNOM
Price$0.003904$0.00008426
Market cap$3.82M$82.10K
24h volume$1.02K$96.35
Liquidity$28.24K$28.16K
FDV$3.82M$82.10K
Holders15,2352,824
Safety gradeAA

Where they differ

What the data says

EAT

EAT is the token of 375ai — a Solana DePIN project running edge devices that collect real-world data (traffic, environment) for sale to AI and mapping consumers. The mint 375aiUqZERLrB9sHtsArKr4nuWCgBrtqibUDBMGeLvZC is what our scan tracks: $3.8 million market cap, $28 thousand of liquidity and 15,235 holders as of September 26, 2026.

The honest DePIN ledger: the contributor network is real — fifteen thousand holders reads as device operators, not just traders — and data-for-AI is a genuine demand thesis. The caution is the same one every DePIN carries: emissions pay contributors before customer revenue matures, so the token front-runs its business. Pool depth is thin for the cap; that is the practical figure.

Full EAT safety read →

NOM

NOM — "Trust in Nom" on Solana, mint 2MDr15dTn6km3NWusFcnZyhq3vWpYDg7vWprghpzbonk — is a persona meme (@theonlynom) on the bonk.fun launchpad holding 2,824 wallets against a $82 thousand cap.

The September 26, 2026 snapshot shows a $25 thousand pool — nearly a third of the cap — on ~$629 of daily volume. Mint and freeze are both revoked.

Full NOM safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, EAT or NOM?

By tracked market cap: EAT (Solana) measures $3.82M and NOM (Solana) measures $82.10K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, EAT or NOM?

On the contract checks we publish: EAT (Solana) grades A and NOM (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have EAT and NOM performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show EAT at −4.61% and NOM at +19.5%.

More comparisons

EAT vs LOOBYEAT vs FEBUVIDAX vs EATQTO vs EATNOM vs LOOBYNOM vs FEBUVIDAX vs NOMQTO vs NOM

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.