HostEAT vs FEBU — price, size and safety, side by side
EAT (Solana) vs FEBU (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
EAT vs FEBU — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| EAT | FEBU | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.003904 | $0.00007034 |
| Market cap | $3.82M | $72.54K |
| 24h volume | $1.02K | $6.17K |
| Liquidity | $28.24K | $28.13K |
| FDV | $3.82M | $72.54K |
| Holders | 15,235 | 7,864 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- EAT measures ~53× the market cap of FEBU
- FEBU measures ~6.0× the 24h volume of EAT
- EAT measures ~1.9× the holder count of FEBU
- over the shared window EAT moved −4.61% while FEBU moved −27.0%
What the data says
EAT
EAT is the token of 375ai — a Solana DePIN project running edge devices that collect real-world data (traffic, environment) for sale to AI and mapping consumers. The mint 375aiUqZERLrB9sHtsArKr4nuWCgBrtqibUDBMGeLvZC is what our scan tracks: $3.8 million market cap, $28 thousand of liquidity and 15,235 holders as of September 26, 2026.
The honest DePIN ledger: the contributor network is real — fifteen thousand holders reads as device operators, not just traders — and data-for-AI is a genuine demand thesis. The caution is the same one every DePIN carries: emissions pay contributors before customer revenue matures, so the token front-runs its business. Pool depth is thin for the cap; that is the practical figure.
FEBU
FEBU — "febu" on Solana, mint 4ko5tSr5o3H4v1sFtjTSd9MPUW7yx5AFCpkNPoL6pump — is a persona meme (imfebu.com, @febu) that was mid-crash in the September 26, 2026 snapshot: −15.4% on the day on ~$9.1 thousand of volume — real selling, not drift.
Across 7,864 holders, the cap sits at $73 thousand on a $25.9 thousand pool — the liquidity is deep, which is exactly what lets a −15% day print that much volume. Mint and freeze are both revoked; dev holds 2.4%.
FAQ
Which is bigger, EAT or FEBU?
By tracked market cap: EAT (Solana) measures $3.82M and FEBU (Solana) measures $72.54K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, EAT or FEBU?
On the contract checks we publish: EAT (Solana) grades A and FEBU (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have EAT and FEBU performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show EAT at −4.61% and FEBU at −27.0%.
More comparisons
EAT vs NOMEAT vs LOOBYVIDAX vs EATQTO vs EATLOOBY vs FEBUNOM vs FEBUVIDAX vs FEBUFEBU vs MESA
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.