HostQTO vs EAT — price, size and safety, side by side
QTO (Solana) vs EAT (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
QTO vs EAT — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| QTO | EAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00006793 | $0.003912 |
| Market cap | $64.05K | $3.82M |
| 24h volume | $32.11 | $1.02K |
| Liquidity | $28.38K | $28.24K |
| FDV | $64.05K | $3.82M |
| Holders | 3,870 | 15,235 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- EAT measures ~60× the market cap of QTO
- EAT measures ~32× the 24h volume of QTO
- EAT measures ~3.9× the holder count of QTO
- over the shared window QTO moved +18.4% while EAT moved −4.41%
What the data says
QTO
QTO — "Quanto" on Solana, mint quantoL84tL1HvygKcz3TJtWRU6dFPW8imMzCa4qxGW — is a quanto.trade-anchored token with a "quantoL84t…" vanity mint, holding 3,870 wallets on a $64.0 thousand cap.
Mint and freeze are both revoked on a ~$23 thousand pool.
EAT
EAT is the token of 375ai — a Solana DePIN project running edge devices that collect real-world data (traffic, environment) for sale to AI and mapping consumers. The mint 375aiUqZERLrB9sHtsArKr4nuWCgBrtqibUDBMGeLvZC is what our scan tracks: $3.8 million market cap, $28 thousand of liquidity and 15,235 holders as of September 26, 2026.
The honest DePIN ledger: the contributor network is real — fifteen thousand holders reads as device operators, not just traders — and data-for-AI is a genuine demand thesis. The caution is the same one every DePIN carries: emissions pay contributors before customer revenue matures, so the token front-runs its business. Pool depth is thin for the cap; that is the practical figure.
FAQ
Which is bigger, QTO or EAT?
By tracked market cap: QTO (Solana) measures $64.05K and EAT (Solana) measures $3.82M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, QTO or EAT?
On the contract checks we publish: QTO (Solana) grades A and EAT (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have QTO and EAT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show QTO at +18.4% and EAT at −4.41%.
More comparisons
QTO vs VIDAXSWARM vs QTOLOOK vs QTOQTO vs NOMEAT vs NOMEAT vs LOOBYEAT vs FEBUVIDAX vs EAT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.