HostUSD₮0 vs PYTH — price, size and safety, side by side
USD₮0 (Berachain) vs PYTH (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-27 / 2026-10-27.
USD₮0 vs PYTH — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-27T12:16:05
| USD₮0 | PYTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.00 | $0.07215 |
| Market cap | $4.08B | $580.57M |
| 24h volume | $167.24K DEX | $1.98M DEX |
| Liquidity | $625.54K | $507.53K |
| FDV | $37.36M | $737.23M |
| Holders | 75,853 | 307,239 |
| Age (days) | 418 | — |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- USD₮0 measures ~7.0× the market cap of PYTH
- PYTH measures ~12× the 24h volume of USD₮0
- PYTH measures ~4.1× the holder count of USD₮0
- over the shared window USD₮0 moved −0.27% while PYTH moved −12.1%
What the data says
USD₮0
There's a small gap on this page — USD₮0's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
By the numbers, USD₮0 is showing thin liquidity of $625.54K, 75,853 holders and an established record at 418 days as of 2026-10-09. The number worth sitting with is that $625.54K of depth against a market cap of about $4.08B — a thin pool for a token this size, which means a position that feels small to you can still be large for the pool: USD₮0 reprices on relatively little flow, and a sizable exit will slip. A 75,853-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
PYTH
PYTH is infrastructure wearing a token. The Pyth Network supplies price feeds — the numbers that tell a lending protocol when to liquidate and a perps engine where to mark — to hundreds of applications across dozens of chains, sourced from exchanges and trading firms publishing their own data. The token governs that network. As of the October 6, 2026 snapshot it carries roughly $580.6 million of market capitalization across 307,239 holders at mint HZ1JovNiVvGrGNiiYvEozEVgZ58xaU3RKwX8eACQBCt3.
Token mechanics: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked. Nothing about the SPL structure can be used against a holder, which is the baseline this site grades first. The score on this page sits at 92 rather than a clean 100, and the honest reason is visible in one figure: tracked on-chain liquidity of only about $508 thousand in this snapshot — strikingly thin against a nine-figure market cap. PYTH's real depth lives on centralized exchanges; the Solana pools our read samples are a sliver. If your position size matters, that distinction decides where you should exit.
FAQ
Which is bigger, USD₮0 or PYTH?
By tracked market cap: USD₮0 (Berachain) measures $4.08B and PYTH (Solana) measures $580.57M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, USD₮0 or PYTH?
On the contract checks we publish: USD₮0 (Berachain) grades B and PYTH (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have USD₮0 and PYTH performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-27T12:16:05, the measured snapshots show USD₮0 at −0.27% and PYTH at −12.1%.
More comparisons
WBTC vs USD₮0USD₮0 vs STABLELBTC vs USD₮0USD₮0 vs UVMSTABLE vs PYTHPYTH vs UVMPYTH vs GOHOMEPYTH vs CRV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-27T12:16:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.