HostLBTC vs USD₮0 — price, size and safety, side by side
LBTC (Solana) vs USD₮0 (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-27 / 2026-10-27.
LBTC vs USD₮0 — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-27T12:16:05
| LBTC | USD₮0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $79.59K | $1.00 |
| Market cap | $8.61M | $4.08B |
| 24h volume | $25.53K DEX | $167.24K DEX |
| Liquidity | $3.36M | $625.54K |
| FDV | $8.61M | $37.36M |
| Holders | 472 | 75,853 |
| Age (days) | — | 418 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- USD₮0 measures ~474× the market cap of LBTC
- LBTC measures ~5.4× the liquidity of USD₮0
- USD₮0 measures ~6.6× the 24h volume of LBTC
- USD₮0 measures ~161× the holder count of LBTC
What the data says
LBTC
LBTC is Lombard's staked Bitcoin — the liquid-staking token that puts BTC to work in Babylon's staking layer while circulating as a DeFi-usable claim, one of the "productive BTC" class that grew out of Babylon's launch. The mint LBTCgU4b3wsFKsPwBn1rRZDx5DoFutM6RPiEt1TPDsY is the Solana deployment; our October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $3.4 million of tracked pool liquidity and grades it A.
The honest mechanics: LBTC is a claim on BTC that's been restaked into Babylon's security model — the yield is Babylon's protocol paying for its security budget, which means the return is emissions-shaped (real but endogenous to the system) rather than external revenue. The custody chain is Lombard's consortium model; on Solana, add the bridge that carried it here.
USD₮0
There's a small gap on this page — USD₮0's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
By the numbers, USD₮0 is showing thin liquidity of $625.54K, 75,853 holders and an established record at 418 days as of 2026-10-09. The number worth sitting with is that $625.54K of depth against a market cap of about $4.08B — a thin pool for a token this size, which means a position that feels small to you can still be large for the pool: USD₮0 reprices on relatively little flow, and a sizable exit will slip. A 75,853-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LBTC or USD₮0?
By tracked market cap: LBTC (Solana) measures $8.61M and USD₮0 (Berachain) measures $4.08B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LBTC or USD₮0?
On the contract checks we publish: LBTC (Solana) grades A and USD₮0 (Berachain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LBTC and USD₮0 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-27T12:16:05, the measured snapshots show LBTC at −4.39% and USD₮0 at −0.27%.
More comparisons
USD0 vs LBTCLBTC vs PENDLEXRP vs LBTCASTER vs LBTCWBTC vs USD₮0USD₮0 vs STABLEUSD₮0 vs PYTHUSD₮0 vs UVM
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-27T12:16:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.