HostUSD₮0 vs UVM — price, size and safety, side by side
USD₮0 (Berachain) vs UVM (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-27 / 2026-10-27.
USD₮0 vs UVM — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-27T12:16:05
| USD₮0 | UVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.00 | $0.3827 |
| Market cap | $4.08B | $766.92M |
| 24h volume | $167.24K DEX | $7.02K DEX |
| Liquidity | $625.54K | $440.27K |
| FDV | $37.36M | $712.87M |
| Holders | 75,853 | 2,858 |
| Age (days) | 418 | 601 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- USD₮0 measures ~5.3× the market cap of UVM
- USD₮0 measures ~24× the 24h volume of UVM
- USD₮0 measures ~27× the holder count of UVM
What the data says
USD₮0
There's a small gap on this page — USD₮0's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
By the numbers, USD₮0 is showing thin liquidity of $625.54K, 75,853 holders and an established record at 418 days as of 2026-10-09. The number worth sitting with is that $625.54K of depth against a market cap of about $4.08B — a thin pool for a token this size, which means a position that feels small to you can still be large for the pool: USD₮0 reprices on relatively little flow, and a sizable exit will slip. A 75,853-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
UVM
UVM — Universe Meta — is a 601-day-old Polygon token at 0x6966fec28ae7f598bd29c788def80f56ffa12de9, and it carries the batch's widest cap-to-book gap: a $766.9 million market cap against $440.3 thousand of tracked pool liquidity on the October 6, 2026 snapshot.
The page's own flag says it plainly: the pool is large in dollars but thin against the token's own cap — an exit has to be sized against the pool, not the headline. The tape is quiet besides: $7.0 thousand of daily volume says the cap sits still rather than trades. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, USD₮0 or UVM?
By tracked market cap: USD₮0 (Berachain) measures $4.08B and UVM (Polygon) measures $766.92M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, USD₮0 or UVM?
On the contract checks we publish: USD₮0 (Berachain) grades B and UVM (Polygon) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have USD₮0 and UVM performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-27T12:16:05, the measured snapshots show USD₮0 at −0.27% and UVM at −1.74%.
More comparisons
WBTC vs USD₮0USD₮0 vs STABLEUSD₮0 vs PYTHLBTC vs USD₮0PYTH vs UVMUVM vs GOHOMESTABLE vs UVMUVM vs CRV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-27T12:16:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.