HostPYTH vs UVM — price, size and safety, side by side
PYTH (Solana) vs UVM (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-27 / 2026-10-27.
PYTH vs UVM — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-27T12:16:05
| PYTH | UVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.07215 | $0.3827 |
| Market cap | $580.57M | $766.92M |
| 24h volume | $1.98M DEX | $7.02K DEX |
| Liquidity | $507.53K | $440.27K |
| FDV | $737.23M | $712.87M |
| Holders | 307,239 | 2,858 |
| Age (days) | — | 601 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- PYTH measures ~282× the 24h volume of UVM
- PYTH measures ~108× the holder count of UVM
- over the shared window PYTH moved +13.3% while UVM moved −3.16%
What the data says
PYTH
PYTH is infrastructure wearing a token. The Pyth Network supplies price feeds — the numbers that tell a lending protocol when to liquidate and a perps engine where to mark — to hundreds of applications across dozens of chains, sourced from exchanges and trading firms publishing their own data. The token governs that network. As of the October 6, 2026 snapshot it carries roughly $580.6 million of market capitalization across 307,239 holders at mint HZ1JovNiVvGrGNiiYvEozEVgZ58xaU3RKwX8eACQBCt3.
Token mechanics: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked. Nothing about the SPL structure can be used against a holder, which is the baseline this site grades first. The score on this page sits at 92 rather than a clean 100, and the honest reason is visible in one figure: tracked on-chain liquidity of only about $508 thousand in this snapshot — strikingly thin against a nine-figure market cap. PYTH's real depth lives on centralized exchanges; the Solana pools our read samples are a sliver. If your position size matters, that distinction decides where you should exit.
UVM
UVM — Universe Meta — is a 601-day-old Polygon token at 0x6966fec28ae7f598bd29c788def80f56ffa12de9, and it carries the batch's widest cap-to-book gap: a $766.9 million market cap against $440.3 thousand of tracked pool liquidity on the October 6, 2026 snapshot.
The page's own flag says it plainly: the pool is large in dollars but thin against the token's own cap — an exit has to be sized against the pool, not the headline. The tape is quiet besides: $7.0 thousand of daily volume says the cap sits still rather than trades. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, PYTH or UVM?
By tracked market cap: PYTH (Solana) measures $580.57M and UVM (Polygon) measures $766.92M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, PYTH or UVM?
On the contract checks we publish: PYTH (Solana) grades A and UVM (Polygon) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have PYTH and UVM performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-27T12:16:05, the measured snapshots show PYTH at +13.3% and UVM at −3.16%.
More comparisons
STABLE vs PYTHUSD₮0 vs PYTHPYTH vs GOHOMEPYTH vs CRVUVM vs GOHOMESTABLE vs UVMUVM vs CRVUVM vs RAIN
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-27T12:16:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.