HostUVM vs RAIN — price, size and safety, side by side
UVM (Polygon) vs RAIN (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-27 / 2026-10-27.
UVM vs RAIN — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-27T12:16:05
| UVM | RAIN | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.3827 | $0.007191 |
| Market cap | $766.92M | $7.28B |
| 24h volume | $7.02K DEX | $1.06M DEX |
| Liquidity | $440.27K | $347.29K |
| FDV | $712.87M | $11.73B |
| Holders | 2,858 | 173,867 |
| Age (days) | 601 | 355 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RAIN measures ~9.5× the market cap of UVM
- RAIN measures ~150× the 24h volume of UVM
- RAIN measures ~61× the holder count of UVM
- over the shared window UVM moved −3.16% while RAIN moved −49.0%
What the data says
UVM
UVM — Universe Meta — is a 601-day-old Polygon token at 0x6966fec28ae7f598bd29c788def80f56ffa12de9, and it carries the batch's widest cap-to-book gap: a $766.9 million market cap against $440.3 thousand of tracked pool liquidity on the October 6, 2026 snapshot.
The page's own flag says it plainly: the pool is large in dollars but thin against the token's own cap — an exit has to be sized against the pool, not the headline. The tape is quiet besides: $7.0 thousand of daily volume says the cap sits still rather than trades. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
RAIN
RAIN is a mid-cap token on Arbitrum trading on real depth: the contract 0x25118290e6a5f4139381d072181157035864099d is what our scan tracks, with $347 thousand of pool liquidity as of October 9, 2026.
The honest note is about verifiability rather than the project: tokens in this tier have shallow public documentation, and our scan's read is primarily on-chain — the pool is real and functional, but verify the project's identity and contract ownership through its official channels before treating the liquidity as endorsement. Arbitrum hosts a long tail of tokens that look similar in a scan.
FAQ
Which is bigger, UVM or RAIN?
By tracked market cap: UVM (Polygon) measures $766.92M and RAIN (Arbitrum) measures $7.28B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, UVM or RAIN?
On the contract checks we publish: UVM (Polygon) grades A and RAIN (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have UVM and RAIN performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-27T12:16:05, the measured snapshots show UVM at −3.16% and RAIN at −49.0%.
More comparisons
PYTH vs UVMUVM vs GOHOMESTABLE vs UVMUVM vs CRVRAIN vs HLXRAIN vs RENDERCRV vs RAINGOHOME vs RAIN
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-27T12:16:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.