HostPYTH vs CRV — price, size and safety, side by side
PYTH (Solana) vs CRV (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-27 / 2026-10-27.
PYTH vs CRV — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-10-27T12:16:05
| PYTH | CRV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.07215 | $0.3345 |
| Market cap | $580.57M | $559.04M |
| 24h volume | $1.98M DEX | $948.47K DEX |
| Liquidity | $507.53K | $9.96M |
| FDV | $737.23M | $861.85M |
| Holders | 307,239 | 101,017 |
| Age (days) | — | 1,105 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CRV measures ~20× the liquidity of PYTH
- PYTH measures ~2.1× the 24h volume of CRV
- PYTH measures ~3.0× the holder count of CRV
- over the shared window PYTH moved −14.3% while CRV moved −2.66%
What the data says
PYTH
PYTH is infrastructure wearing a token. The Pyth Network supplies price feeds — the numbers that tell a lending protocol when to liquidate and a perps engine where to mark — to hundreds of applications across dozens of chains, sourced from exchanges and trading firms publishing their own data. The token governs that network. As of the October 6, 2026 snapshot it carries roughly $580.6 million of market capitalization across 307,239 holders at mint HZ1JovNiVvGrGNiiYvEozEVgZ58xaU3RKwX8eACQBCt3.
Token mechanics: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked. Nothing about the SPL structure can be used against a holder, which is the baseline this site grades first. The score on this page sits at 92 rather than a clean 100, and the honest reason is visible in one figure: tracked on-chain liquidity of only about $508 thousand in this snapshot — strikingly thin against a nine-figure market cap. PYTH's real depth lives on centralized exchanges; the Solana pools our read samples are a sliver. If your position size matters, that distinction decides where you should exit.
CRV
CRV — Curve DAO Token at 0xd533a949740bb3306d119cc777fa900ba034cd52 — is the governance and incentive token of Curve, the stable-swap AMM that carries a meaningful share of all stablecoin and LST volume on Ethereum. This is a six-year-old protocol token, not a launch, and the honest risks are the ones an established protocol token actually runs: governance economics, emissions, and founder concentration — not honeypot mechanics.
The October 9, 2026 snapshot reads a $559.0 million market cap against an $861.8 million fully-diluted value — roughly two-thirds of eventual supply circulating — with $10.0 million of tracked pool depth and 101,017 holders. Depth at that scale is a real exit book for a retail position.
FAQ
Which is bigger, PYTH or CRV?
By tracked market cap: PYTH (Solana) measures $580.57M and CRV (Ethereum) measures $559.04M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, PYTH or CRV?
On the contract checks we publish: PYTH (Solana) grades A and CRV (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have PYTH and CRV performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-10-27T12:16:05, the measured snapshots show PYTH at −14.3% and CRV at −2.66%.
More comparisons
STABLE vs PYTHPYTH vs UVMUSD₮0 vs PYTHPYTH vs GOHOMEUSDTB vs CRVCRV vs USDCCRV vs SUSDAIAAVE vs CRV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-10-27T12:16:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.