HostUNI vs CHIP — price, size and safety, side by side
UNI (Ethereum) vs CHIP (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
UNI vs CHIP — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| UNI | CHIP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $9.63 | $0.05009 |
| Market cap | $5.60B | $98.75M |
| 24h volume | $5.14M | $810.21K |
| Liquidity | $25.55M | $470.85K |
| FDV | $8.01B | $493.74M |
| Holders | 382,165 | 5,600 |
| Age (days) | 1,727 | 153 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- UNI measures ~57× the market cap of CHIP
- UNI measures ~54× the liquidity of CHIP
- UNI measures ~6.3× the 24h volume of CHIP
- UNI measures ~68× the holder count of CHIP
- over the shared window UNI moved +38.5% while CHIP moved +78.3%
What the data says
UNI
UNI is Uniswap's governance token — the asset of the protocol that invented the automated market maker and still clears more DEX volume than the rest of the field combined. The deployment 0x1f9840a85d5af5bf1d1762f925bdaddc4201f984 is the canonical mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $25.5 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set.
The honest asymmetry is the governance-token shape: UNI's thesis is control over a fee-generating machine, but the "fee switch" — the mechanism that would route protocol revenue to holders — has been proposed and deferred for years, so the token trades on governance value and the perennial expectation rather than cashflow it actually pays. That makes its valuation more reflexive than a productive asset's.
CHIP
CHIP is a mid-cap token on Arbitrum: the contract 0x0c1c1c109fe34733fca54b82d7b46b75cfb71f6e is what our scan tracks, with $471 thousand of pool liquidity as of September 26, 2026 — the deepest pool in this batch's EVM tier.
Same verifiability note as the rest of this tier: the liquidity figure is a real on-chain fact and a functional market, but it is not a credential — CHIP-tickered tokens exist on several chains, so confirm this contract is the project you mean to hold before trading. Deep pool, ordinary verification burden.
FAQ
Which is bigger, UNI or CHIP?
By tracked market cap: UNI (Ethereum) measures $5.60B and CHIP (Arbitrum) measures $98.75M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, UNI or CHIP?
On the contract checks we publish: UNI (Ethereum) grades A and CHIP (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have UNI and CHIP performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show UNI at +38.5% and CHIP at +78.3%.
More comparisons
UNI vs FRXUSDGHO vs UNIUSD1 vs UNIUNI vs SUSDECHIP vs METACCHIP vs BEMFLUID vs CHIPAUDIO vs CHIP
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.