HostFLUID vs CHIP — price, size and safety, side by side
FLUID (Ethereum) vs CHIP (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
FLUID vs CHIP — normalized performance, 2026-08-24 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| FLUID | CHIP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.36 | $0.05009 |
| Market cap | $119.01M | $98.75M |
| 24h volume | $3.11M | $810.21K |
| Liquidity | $474.84K | $470.85K |
| FDV | $142.19M | $493.74M |
| Holders | 11,748 | 5,600 |
| Age (days) | 1,699 | 153 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- FLUID measures ~3.8× the 24h volume of CHIP
- FLUID measures ~2.1× the holder count of CHIP
- over the shared window FLUID moved +6.93% while CHIP moved +78.3%
What the data says
FLUID
FLUID is the token of Fluid — the DEX-and-lending protocol built by the Instadapp team, one of Ethereum DeFi's longest-running builders. The contract 0x6f40d4a6237c257fff2db00fa0510deeecd303eb is what our scan tracks: $475 thousand of pool liquidity as of September 26, 2026.
The honest read: Fluid is a working protocol with real lending and DEX volume, and the token is a governance-and-value-accrual claim on that activity — a cleaner fundamental story than most of the corpus carries. The caution is the usual one for mid-cap DeFi: liquidity on public pools is modest relative to the fully-diluted supply, and the token trades on sector sentiment at least as much as on protocol metrics.
CHIP
CHIP is a mid-cap token on Arbitrum: the contract 0x0c1c1c109fe34733fca54b82d7b46b75cfb71f6e is what our scan tracks, with $471 thousand of pool liquidity as of September 26, 2026 — the deepest pool in this batch's EVM tier.
Same verifiability note as the rest of this tier: the liquidity figure is a real on-chain fact and a functional market, but it is not a credential — CHIP-tickered tokens exist on several chains, so confirm this contract is the project you mean to hold before trading. Deep pool, ordinary verification burden.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FLUID or CHIP?
By tracked market cap: FLUID (Ethereum) measures $119.01M and CHIP (Arbitrum) measures $98.75M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FLUID or CHIP?
On the contract checks we publish: FLUID (Ethereum) grades B and CHIP (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FLUID and CHIP performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-08-24 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show FLUID at +6.93% and CHIP at +78.3%.
More comparisons
AUDIO vs FLUIDARX vs FLUIDFLUID vs METACNOS vs FLUIDCHIP vs METACCHIP vs BEMAUDIO vs CHIPARX vs CHIP
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-08-24→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.