HostCHIP vs METAC — price, size and safety, side by side
CHIP (Arbitrum) vs METAC (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
CHIP vs METAC — normalized performance, 2026-09-18T04:43:53 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| CHIP | METAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.05009 | $748.09 |
| Market cap | $98.75M | $1.99M |
| 24h volume | $810.21K | $5.11M |
| Liquidity | $470.85K | $470.23K |
| FDV | $493.74M | $2.03M |
| Holders | 5,600 | 2,525 |
| Age (days) | 153 | 39 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CHIP measures ~50× the market cap of METAC
- METAC measures ~6.3× the 24h volume of CHIP
- CHIP measures ~2.2× the holder count of METAC
- over the shared window CHIP moved +78.3% while METAC moved +11.8%
What the data says
CHIP
CHIP is a mid-cap token on Arbitrum: the contract 0x0c1c1c109fe34733fca54b82d7b46b75cfb71f6e is what our scan tracks, with $471 thousand of pool liquidity as of September 26, 2026 — the deepest pool in this batch's EVM tier.
Same verifiability note as the rest of this tier: the liquidity figure is a real on-chain fact and a functional market, but it is not a credential — CHIP-tickered tokens exist on several chains, so confirm this contract is the project you mean to hold before trading. Deep pool, ordinary verification burden.
METAC
METAC on Base — 0xb2000000000000000000008bc8786b856e61707c — is another member of the 0xb200… tokenized-equity family: named "Meta Platforms Inc.", priced $669.44 in the September 27, 2026 snapshot, in line with the underlying stock. $470 thousand of liquidity, roughly $9.9 million of daily volume.
One issuer, one family, many wrappers — that's the structural fact this page exists to state. Each stock-wrapped contract is a separate pool, a separate price, a separate point of failure, even though all share a deployer. The family's shared prefix makes verifying the issuer trivial; it also means a problem at the issuer is a problem for every member at once. Correlated counterparty risk is the cost of the convenience.
FAQ
Which is bigger, CHIP or METAC?
By tracked market cap: CHIP (Arbitrum) measures $98.75M and METAC (Base) measures $1.99M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, CHIP or METAC?
On the contract checks we publish: CHIP (Arbitrum) grades B and METAC (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have CHIP and METAC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-18T04:43:53 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show CHIP at +78.3% and METAC at +11.8%.
More comparisons
CHIP vs BEMFLUID vs CHIPAUDIO vs CHIPARX vs CHIPMETAC vs BEMFLUID vs METACAUDIO vs METACARX vs METAC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-18T04:43:53→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.