HostUNI vs SUSDE — price, size and safety, side by side
UNI (Ethereum) vs SUSDE (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
UNI vs SUSDE — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| UNI | SUSDE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $9.63 | $1.26 |
| Market cap | $5.60B | $1.32B |
| 24h volume | $5.14M | $1.53M |
| Liquidity | $25.55M | $24.55M |
| FDV | $8.01B | $1.32B |
| Holders | 382,165 | 12,154 |
| Age (days) | 1,727 | 473 |
| Safety grade | A | E |
Where they differ
- UNI measures ~4.2× the market cap of SUSDE
- UNI measures ~3.3× the 24h volume of SUSDE
- UNI measures ~31× the holder count of SUSDE
- over the shared window UNI moved +38.5% while SUSDE moved −0.04%
What the data says
UNI
UNI is Uniswap's governance token — the asset of the protocol that invented the automated market maker and still clears more DEX volume than the rest of the field combined. The deployment 0x1f9840a85d5af5bf1d1762f925bdaddc4201f984 is the canonical mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $25.5 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set.
The honest asymmetry is the governance-token shape: UNI's thesis is control over a fee-generating machine, but the "fee switch" — the mechanism that would route protocol revenue to holders — has been proposed and deferred for years, so the token trades on governance value and the perennial expectation rather than cashflow it actually pays. That makes its valuation more reflexive than a productive asset's.
SUSDE
sUSDe is the yield-bearing half of Ethena's system — USDe locked in the staking contract, accruing the funding-rate and staking yield the delta-neutral hedge generates. That is why it trades above a dollar ($1.24 at our September 27, 2026 read): the price is the receipt appreciating, not a peg. The contract 0x9d39a5de30e57443bff2a8307a4256c8797a3497 is the canonical Ethereum deployment; tracked pool liquidity reads $24.5 million.
The honest mechanics: holding sUSDe means opting into the full Ethena stack — the basis-trade carry (which can go negative), the offshore-exchange custody of the hedge, plus a ~7-day unstaking cooldown on the way out. The cooldown matters in stress: sUSDe can trade at a discount to its accrued value precisely when everyone wants the exit at once. None of this is hypothetical — it is the price of the yield.
FAQ
Which is bigger, UNI or SUSDE?
By tracked market cap: UNI (Ethereum) measures $5.60B and SUSDE (Ethereum) measures $1.32B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, UNI or SUSDE?
On the contract checks we publish: UNI (Ethereum) grades A and SUSDE (Ethereum) grades E. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have UNI and SUSDE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show UNI at +38.5% and SUSDE at −0.04%.
More comparisons
UNI vs FRXUSDGHO vs UNIUSD1 vs UNITBTC vs UNISUSDE vs ETHFRXUSD vs SUSDESUSDE vs LINKSUSDE vs USD1
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.