HostTBTC vs UNI — price, size and safety, side by side
TBTC (Ethereum) vs UNI (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
TBTC vs UNI — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| TBTC | UNI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $83.41K | $9.63 |
| Market cap | $348.57M | $5.60B |
| 24h volume | $346.17K | $5.14M |
| Liquidity | $26.61M | $25.55M |
| FDV | $348.57M | $8.01B |
| Holders | 25,225 | 382,165 |
| Age (days) | 871 | 1,727 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- UNI measures ~16× the market cap of TBTC
- UNI measures ~15× the 24h volume of TBTC
- UNI measures ~15× the holder count of TBTC
- over the shared window TBTC moved +7.88% while UNI moved +38.5%
What the data says
TBTC
tBTC is Threshold Network's trust-minimized wrapped Bitcoin — the decentralized-custody answer to WBTC, where a rotating set of node operators secures the BTC rather than a single custodian. The deployment 0x18084fba666a33d37592fa2633fd49a74dd93a88 is the v2 mint; our September 27, 2026 snapshot reads $26.6 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest contrast is the whole point of the asset: tBTC trades BitGo's institutional custody for a threshold-signature committee — no single company can lose or freeze the coins, but the security model is cryptographic-economic (operator collateral) rather than legal, which is a different risk shape, not a strictly smaller one. Its depth vs WBTC's billions is the market's honest verdict on how much that trade matters to people.
UNI
UNI is Uniswap's governance token — the asset of the protocol that invented the automated market maker and still clears more DEX volume than the rest of the field combined. The deployment 0x1f9840a85d5af5bf1d1762f925bdaddc4201f984 is the canonical mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $25.5 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set.
The honest asymmetry is the governance-token shape: UNI's thesis is control over a fee-generating machine, but the "fee switch" — the mechanism that would route protocol revenue to holders — has been proposed and deferred for years, so the token trades on governance value and the perennial expectation rather than cashflow it actually pays. That makes its valuation more reflexive than a productive asset's.
FAQ
Which is bigger, TBTC or UNI?
By tracked market cap: TBTC (Ethereum) measures $348.57M and UNI (Ethereum) measures $5.60B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, TBTC or UNI?
On the contract checks we publish: TBTC (Ethereum) grades B and UNI (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have TBTC and UNI performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show TBTC at +7.88% and UNI at +38.5%.
More comparisons
TBTC vs USD1TBTC vs GHOTBTC vs FRXUSDTRUMP vs TBTCUNI vs FRXUSDGHO vs UNIUSD1 vs UNIUNI vs SUSDE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.