HostGHO vs UNI — price, size and safety, side by side
GHO (Ethereum) vs UNI (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
GHO vs UNI — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| GHO | UNI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9996 | $9.63 |
| Market cap | $697.96M | $5.60B |
| 24h volume | $1.72M | $5.14M |
| Liquidity | $26.48M | $25.55M |
| FDV | $697.96M | $8.01B |
| Holders | 8,133 | 382,165 |
| Age (days) | 368 | 1,727 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- UNI measures ~8.0× the market cap of GHO
- UNI measures ~3.0× the 24h volume of GHO
- UNI measures ~47× the holder count of GHO
- over the shared window GHO moved +0.16% while UNI moved +38.5%
What the data says
GHO
GHO is Aave's native stablecoin — minted against collateral deposited in the Aave protocol, with its monetary policy governed by Aave governance. The contract 0x40d16fc0246ad3160ccc09b8d0d3a2cd28ae6c2f is what our scan tracks: $26.5 million of pool liquidity as of September 26, 2026, trading essentially at its dollar peg.
The honest mechanics: GHO is overcollateralized-debt stablecoin design — borrowers mint it against Aave collateral, so its backing is the health of Aave's markets rather than a bank account. Peg deviations are the figure to watch: a stablecoin that trades below peg is the market pricing the collateral-and-arbitrage machinery's speed, and GHO's history includes real time spent under a dollar before stabilizers matured.
UNI
UNI is Uniswap's governance token — the asset of the protocol that invented the automated market maker and still clears more DEX volume than the rest of the field combined. The deployment 0x1f9840a85d5af5bf1d1762f925bdaddc4201f984 is the canonical mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $25.5 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set.
The honest asymmetry is the governance-token shape: UNI's thesis is control over a fee-generating machine, but the "fee switch" — the mechanism that would route protocol revenue to holders — has been proposed and deferred for years, so the token trades on governance value and the perennial expectation rather than cashflow it actually pays. That makes its valuation more reflexive than a productive asset's.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GHO or UNI?
By tracked market cap: GHO (Ethereum) measures $697.96M and UNI (Ethereum) measures $5.60B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GHO or UNI?
On the contract checks we publish: GHO (Ethereum) grades B and UNI (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GHO and UNI performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show GHO at +0.16% and UNI at +38.5%.
More comparisons
USD1 vs GHOTBTC vs GHOGHO vs FRXUSDGHO vs SUSDEUNI vs FRXUSDUSD1 vs UNIUNI vs SUSDETBTC vs UNI
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.