HostUNI vs AMZNC — price, size and safety, side by side
UNI (Ethereum) vs AMZNC (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
UNI vs AMZNC — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| UNI | AMZNC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $9.63 | $249.85 |
| Market cap | $5.60B | $1.46M |
| 24h volume | $5.14M | $2.68M |
| Liquidity | $25.55M | $537.11K |
| FDV | $8.01B | $1.46M |
| Holders | 382,165 | 1,967 |
| Age (days) | 1,727 | 18 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- UNI measures ~3,828× the market cap of AMZNC
- UNI measures ~48× the liquidity of AMZNC
- UNI measures ~1.9× the 24h volume of AMZNC
- UNI measures ~194× the holder count of AMZNC
- over the shared window UNI moved +51.4% while AMZNC moved −1.43%
What the data says
UNI
UNI is Uniswap's governance token — the asset of the protocol that invented the automated market maker and still clears more DEX volume than the rest of the field combined. The deployment 0x1f9840a85d5af5bf1d1762f925bdaddc4201f984 is the canonical mint; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $25.5 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set.
The honest asymmetry is the governance-token shape: UNI's thesis is control over a fee-generating machine, but the "fee switch" — the mechanism that would route protocol revenue to holders — has been proposed and deferred for years, so the token trades on governance value and the perennial expectation rather than cashflow it actually pays. That makes its valuation more reflexive than a productive asset's.
AMZNC
AMZNC on Base — 0xb200000000000000000000d9192b6b456483c2e8 — is the 0xb200… family's Amazon wrapper: $253.49 in the September 27, 2026 snapshot, tracking the stock, on $537 thousand of liquidity and roughly $5.0 million of daily volume. Eleven days old, ~5x turnover — the family's hot-start signature.
With seven family members now indexed, the pattern worth stating is portfolio-level: the family is building a tokenized S&P basket on Base — Tesla, Apple, Alphabet, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, MicroStrategy, SpaceX, Sandisk — all from one deployer. That concentration is the family's real risk model: not seven independent counterparty questions but one issuer question asked nine times. If the issuer's custody arrangement is sound, the family is uniformly sound; if it isn't, the family fails together.
FAQ
Which is bigger, UNI or AMZNC?
By tracked market cap: UNI (Ethereum) measures $5.60B and AMZNC (Base) measures $1.46M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, UNI or AMZNC?
On the contract checks we publish: UNI (Ethereum) grades A and AMZNC (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have UNI and AMZNC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show UNI at +51.4% and AMZNC at −1.43%.
More comparisons
UNI vs FRXUSDGHO vs UNIUSD1 vs UNIUNI vs SUSDEIDOL vs AMZNCAAVE vs AMZNCAMZNC vs WNUSDT0AMZNC vs ON
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.