HostAMZNC vs ON — price, size and safety, side by side
AMZNC (Base) vs ON (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
AMZNC vs ON — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| AMZNC | ON | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $249.85 | $0.1408 |
| Market cap | $1.46M | $21.33M |
| 24h volume | $2.68M | $986.37K |
| Liquidity | $537.11K | $527.53K |
| FDV | $1.46M | $14.77M |
| Holders | 1,967 | 2,730 |
| Age (days) | 18 | 334 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- ON measures ~15× the market cap of AMZNC
- AMZNC measures ~2.7× the 24h volume of ON
What the data says
AMZNC
AMZNC on Base — 0xb200000000000000000000d9192b6b456483c2e8 — is the 0xb200… family's Amazon wrapper: $253.49 in the September 27, 2026 snapshot, tracking the stock, on $537 thousand of liquidity and roughly $5.0 million of daily volume. Eleven days old, ~5x turnover — the family's hot-start signature.
With seven family members now indexed, the pattern worth stating is portfolio-level: the family is building a tokenized S&P basket on Base — Tesla, Apple, Alphabet, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, MicroStrategy, SpaceX, Sandisk — all from one deployer. That concentration is the family's real risk model: not seven independent counterparty questions but one issuer question asked nine times. If the issuer's custody arrangement is sound, the family is uniformly sound; if it isn't, the family fails together.
ON
ON at 0x0e4f6209ed984b21edea43ace6e09559ed051d48 — Orochi Network Token — is a 334-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $21.3 million market cap against a $14.8 million fully-diluted figure on 100.0 million units at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The book is workable and the tape is working: $527.5 thousand of tracked depth on $986.4 thousand of 24-hour volume. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, AMZNC or ON?
By tracked market cap: AMZNC (Base) measures $1.46M and ON (BNB Chain) measures $21.33M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, AMZNC or ON?
On the contract checks we publish: AMZNC (Base) grades B and ON (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have AMZNC and ON performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show AMZNC at −2.55% and ON at −4.69%.
More comparisons
IDOL vs AMZNCUNI vs AMZNCAAVE vs AMZNCAMZNC vs WNUSDT0ON vs WOULDWNUSDT0 vs ONON vs CLOON vs SHRUB
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.