HostAMZNC vs WNUSDT0 — price, size and safety, side by side
AMZNC (Base) vs WNUSDT0 (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
AMZNC vs WNUSDT0 — normalized performance, 2026-09-18T04:43:53 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| AMZNC | WNUSDT0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $249.85 | $1.02 |
| Market cap | $1.46M | $455.98K |
| 24h volume | $2.68M | $157.51K |
| Liquidity | $537.11K | $528.19K |
| FDV | $1.46M | $529.18K |
| Holders | 1,967 | 38 |
| Age (days) | 18 | 195 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- AMZNC measures ~3.2× the market cap of WNUSDT0
- AMZNC measures ~17× the 24h volume of WNUSDT0
- AMZNC measures ~52× the holder count of WNUSDT0
What the data says
AMZNC
AMZNC on Base — 0xb200000000000000000000d9192b6b456483c2e8 — is the 0xb200… family's Amazon wrapper: $253.49 in the September 27, 2026 snapshot, tracking the stock, on $537 thousand of liquidity and roughly $5.0 million of daily volume. Eleven days old, ~5x turnover — the family's hot-start signature.
With seven family members now indexed, the pattern worth stating is portfolio-level: the family is building a tokenized S&P basket on Base — Tesla, Apple, Alphabet, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, MicroStrategy, SpaceX, Sandisk — all from one deployer. That concentration is the family's real risk model: not seven independent counterparty questions but one issuer question asked nine times. If the issuer's custody arrangement is sound, the family is uniformly sound; if it isn't, the family fails together.
WNUSDT0
WNUSDT0 is Neverland's wrapped USDT0 on Monad — the lending-market receipt for USDT0 supplied into Neverland's money market, one of the new chain's early DeFi venues. The deployment 0x4e8aaecce10ad9394e96fe5f2bd4e587a7b04298 is the receipt contract; our September 27, 2026 snapshot reads $528 thousand of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest framing mirrors its Aave sibling: a lending receipt is a claim on the market's solvency plus the asset inside — here USDT0, Tether's omnichain dollar over LayerZero — so the holder is three layers from the underlying dollars. Two lending markets clearing seven-figure receipts on a chain this young is the money-market layer actually bootstrapping.
FAQ
Which is bigger, AMZNC or WNUSDT0?
By tracked market cap: AMZNC (Base) measures $1.46M and WNUSDT0 (Monad) measures $455.98K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, AMZNC or WNUSDT0?
On the contract checks we publish: AMZNC (Base) grades B and WNUSDT0 (Monad) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have AMZNC and WNUSDT0 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-18T04:43:53 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show AMZNC at −1.43% and WNUSDT0 at +0.33%.
More comparisons
IDOL vs AMZNCUNI vs AMZNCAAVE vs AMZNCAMZNC vs ONWNUSDT0 vs ONWNUSDT0 vs WOULDWNUSDT0 vs CLOWNUSDT0 vs SHRUB
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-18T04:43:53→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.