HostON vs SHRUB — price, size and safety, side by side
ON (BNB Chain) vs SHRUB (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
ON vs SHRUB — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| ON | SHRUB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1408 | $0.003493 |
| Market cap | $21.33M | $1.21M |
| 24h volume | $986.37K | $5.92M |
| Liquidity | $527.53K | $523.27K |
| FDV | $14.77M | $1.21M |
| Holders | 2,730 | 13,201 |
| Age (days) | 334 | 799 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- ON measures ~18× the market cap of SHRUB
- SHRUB measures ~6.0× the 24h volume of ON
- SHRUB measures ~4.8× the holder count of ON
- over the shared window ON moved −4.69% while SHRUB moved −63.6%
What the data says
ON
ON at 0x0e4f6209ed984b21edea43ace6e09559ed051d48 — Orochi Network Token — is a 334-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $21.3 million market cap against a $14.8 million fully-diluted figure on 100.0 million units at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The book is workable and the tape is working: $527.5 thousand of tracked depth on $986.4 thousand of 24-hour volume. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
SHRUB
SHRUB on Ethereum — 0x3b991130eae3cca364406d718da22fa1c3e7c256 — is the oldest token in this index slice: 799 days tracked, over two years of continuous market history. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $523 thousand of liquidity against roughly $5.9 million of daily volume.
A 799-day-old memecoin running 11x daily turnover is an unusual combination — age this deep normally settles into quiet books, but SHRUB's pool is being cycled industrially even now. That reads as a community token that kept its market-making relationships alive: the asset survived, and the desks around it stayed. It is also a reminder that "old" and "calm" are not the same property.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ON or SHRUB?
By tracked market cap: ON (BNB Chain) measures $21.33M and SHRUB (Ethereum) measures $1.21M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ON or SHRUB?
On the contract checks we publish: ON (BNB Chain) grades A and SHRUB (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ON and SHRUB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show ON at −4.69% and SHRUB at −63.6%.
More comparisons
ON vs WOULDWNUSDT0 vs ONON vs CLOON vs XBTCSHRUB vs XBTCCLO vs SHRUBSHRUB vs WETSHRUB vs TOPENAI
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.