HostMEBT vs UVM — price, size and safety, side by side
MEBT (Polygon) vs UVM (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.
MEBT vs UVM — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30
| MEBT | UVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.70 | $0.3618 |
| Market cap | — | $766.92M |
| 24h volume | $62.63K DEX | $9.07K DEX |
| Liquidity | $217.88K | $211.78K |
| FDV | $3.06M | $673.82M |
| Holders | 7,115 | 2,858 |
| Age (days) | 126 | 601 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- MEBT measures ~6.9× the 24h volume of UVM
- MEBT measures ~2.5× the holder count of UVM
- over the shared window MEBT moved −44.9% while UVM moved −8.44%
What the data says
MEBT
MEBT at 0x99d11bb9bc5f1ee15a817934f33643dee41026d5 is a young Polygon asset — 108 days into its record at the November 4, 2026 snapshot — with 7,115 holders sharing a 1.4 million supply. The snapshot carries no market-cap reading; the book's size is what the pools report.
The contract is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy — the full clean set on a young deployment. The distribution is the counterweight: the ten largest wallets hold 99.8% of supply, an essentially single-bracket book despite the wide holder count. $217.9 thousand of deep tracked depth sees $114.7 thousand of daily volume — a tape that nearly halves the pool daily.
UVM
UVM — Universe Meta — is a 601-day-old Polygon token at 0x6966fec28ae7f598bd29c788def80f56ffa12de9, and it carries the batch's widest cap-to-book gap: a $766.9 million market cap against $211.8 thousand of tracked pool liquidity on the October 31, 2026 snapshot.
The page's own flag says it plainly: the pool is large in dollars but thin against the token's own cap — an exit has to be sized against the pool, not the headline. The tape is quiet besides: $7.0 thousand of daily volume says the cap sits still rather than trades. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MEBT or UVM?
By tracked market cap: MEBT (Polygon) measures — and UVM (Polygon) measures $766.92M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MEBT or UVM?
On the contract checks we publish: MEBT (Polygon) grades A and UVM (Polygon) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MEBT and UVM performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show MEBT at −44.9% and UVM at −8.44%.
More comparisons
SOLVBTC vs MEBTICP vs MEBTMEBT vs AAVE.EMEBT vs RENDERUVM vs AAVE.ESOLVBTC vs UVMUVM vs RENDERICP vs UVM
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.