HostMAGIC vs ESP — price, size and safety, side by side
MAGIC (Arbitrum) vs ESP (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
MAGIC vs ESP — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| MAGIC | ESP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.05171 | $0.1052 |
| Market cap | $17.46M | $71.56M |
| 24h volume | $15.81K | $542.49K |
| Liquidity | $131.05K | $129.54K |
| FDV | $16.24M | $7.86M |
| Holders | 408,713 | 3,284 |
| Age (days) | 900 | 222 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- ESP measures ~4.1× the market cap of MAGIC
- ESP measures ~34× the 24h volume of MAGIC
- MAGIC measures ~124× the holder count of ESP
What the data says
MAGIC
MAGIC at 0x539bde0d7dbd336b79148aa742883198bbf60342 is the Arbitrum-native currency of the Treasure gaming ecosystem — the token that denominates its marketplace and underpins its chain. The September 27, 2026 snapshot counts 408,713 holders around a $17.5 million market cap, the local supply of 313.9 million units reading $16.2 million fully diluted.
Two measured facts carry the read. The contract is an upgradeable proxy — the code behind the address can be swapped after deployment, the standard shape for a managed ecosystem token and a measured fact here, not a rumor. And tracked depth of $131.1 thousand is thin against the cap, on $16.0 thousand of daily volume — this is an asset whose trading happens across venues, not in one deep pool. The ten largest wallets hold 66.0% of supply, which on an ecosystem token usually means treasury and bridge contracts rather than free-floating whales.
ESP
ESP is the token of Espresso Systems — the shared-sequencing and confirmation network built for rollups, launched with a live technical product rather than a roadmap. The contract 0x3b8db18e69d6686ad9371a423afe3dd1065c94f1 is what our scan tracks: $130 thousand of pool liquidity as of September 27, 2026 on Arbitrum.
The honest thesis: Espresso sells fast confirmations and decentralized sequencing to a rollup economy that mostly still runs centralized sequencers — a real product pointed at a real problem. The caution is that the market it serves is still forming: rollup teams have to choose to integrate, and the token's value case rides on that adoption curve more than on present cash flows.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MAGIC or ESP?
By tracked market cap: MAGIC (Arbitrum) measures $17.46M and ESP (Arbitrum) measures $71.56M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MAGIC or ESP?
On the contract checks we publish: MAGIC (Arbitrum) grades B and ESP (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MAGIC and ESP performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show MAGIC at +7.13% and ESP at +10.1%.
More comparisons
NST vs MAGICGOR vs MAGICMAGIC vs GBACKMAGIC vs PONSESP vs KETESP vs EVAABMT vs ESPESP vs ALTSZN
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.