HostMAGIC vs GBACK — price, size and safety, side by side
MAGIC (Arbitrum) vs GBACK (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
MAGIC vs GBACK — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| MAGIC | GBACK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.05171 | $0.005903 |
| Market cap | $17.46M | $6.41M |
| 24h volume | $15.81K | $6.21K |
| Liquidity | $131.05K | $130.68K |
| FDV | $16.24M | $6.41M |
| Holders | 408,713 | 3,541 |
| Age (days) | 900 | — |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- MAGIC measures ~2.7× the market cap of GBACK
- MAGIC measures ~2.5× the 24h volume of GBACK
- MAGIC measures ~115× the holder count of GBACK
- over the shared window MAGIC moved +7.13% while GBACK moved −19.3%
What the data says
MAGIC
MAGIC at 0x539bde0d7dbd336b79148aa742883198bbf60342 is the Arbitrum-native currency of the Treasure gaming ecosystem — the token that denominates its marketplace and underpins its chain. The September 27, 2026 snapshot counts 408,713 holders around a $17.5 million market cap, the local supply of 313.9 million units reading $16.2 million fully diluted.
Two measured facts carry the read. The contract is an upgradeable proxy — the code behind the address can be swapped after deployment, the standard shape for a managed ecosystem token and a measured fact here, not a rumor. And tracked depth of $131.1 thousand is thin against the cap, on $16.0 thousand of daily volume — this is an asset whose trading happens across venues, not in one deep pool. The ten largest wallets hold 66.0% of supply, which on an ecosystem token usually means treasury and bridge contracts rather than free-floating whales.
GBACK
GIVEBACK — GBACK on Solana, mint Fh7mLxtPAysdvHcMcJ37A3vc6WvBVh7JVDwxmwk6pump — carries $6.4 million of market cap across 3,541 holders in the September 26, 2026 snapshot — roughly $1,383 of cap per wallet, a mid-heavy file.
The name is the pitch and the page's caution in one word: "give back" is the claim made by every reflexive-rewards and charity-themed token — value flows back to holders, somehow, eventually. What the data can verify is a market: $131 thousand of liquidity — thin at ~2% of the cap — and ~$15 thousand of daily volume. Mint and freeze revoked.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MAGIC or GBACK?
By tracked market cap: MAGIC (Arbitrum) measures $17.46M and GBACK (Solana) measures $6.41M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MAGIC or GBACK?
On the contract checks we publish: MAGIC (Arbitrum) grades B and GBACK (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MAGIC and GBACK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show MAGIC at +7.13% and GBACK at −19.3%.
More comparisons
NST vs MAGICGOR vs MAGICMAGIC vs PONSDEGOD vs MAGICGBACK vs PONSGBACK vs BITTYNST vs GBACKGOR vs GBACK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.